He beat prime versions of Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles. those 2 wins alone are far greater than any wins fitz has. walcott and charles are far better fighters than fitz. also he has wins over a slew of dangerous contenders like Sid Peaks, Obie Walker, Leroy Haynes, Otis Thomas, Lee Savold, Perk Daniels.
"it should be a DQ 6 win for Elmer Ray." Ray knew the rules he was fighting under and chose not to continue, thus accepting that the fight would be a no contest. You have a point that Ray may have been on the way to a win, but he did not win. I would like to see film before even considering making a judgement to reverse an official verdict. By the way, the point of my post was that Ray deserved a high rating and you are quoting the "case against" which I reject myself.
I think one could make the case that Fitz's win over Corbett outranks Ray's wins over Charles or Walcott because it was a decisive knockout. Ray's wins were close and disputed. Fitz also has ko's of Sharkey, Ruhlin, and Maher, besides Corbett, and was probably screwed in the first Sharkey fight and the Choynski fight, both of which ended with his opponents out cold on the floor. Fitz was certainly a remarkable p4p fighter in context of time and place and has some impressive achievements at heavyweight.
Jersey Joe Walcott - I've always read that as a patchy period for Walcott. He loses to Maxim, he beats him. He loses to Ray, he beats him. Beat Bivins by a shade. He wasn't on top of his form during these months in my opinion. As I understand it, the win was disputed? Where do you rate Joey Maxim as a HW? Ezzard Charles - I've never read an account that says Ezzard was anything other than robbed. Fitzsimmons has a win over a younger, bigger incumbent undisputed HW champion on his ledger. You're going to have to go some to convince me that these gifts bring him neck and neck with a win like that.
Yes, fat slob Heeney, who, in the months running up to his fight with Tunney had a draw with Sharkey and wins over Delaney and Risko. Nobody had ever stopped him. He was approaching the end of course, so was Tunney. I meant Jack Dempsey, who had, of course, been beaten previously. Who do you rank higher at HW, Tunney or Ray?
I think ray. last time I checked i had ray at 22, and tunney around 24 i think. To me tunney is very unproven at heavyweight. he did not prove himself at this weight anymore than michael spinx did.
Douglas didn't beat more good fighters, he obviously has his big win over Tyson which is superior to any win on Weavers, but other than this is resume is very slim. His only other quality wins are over an aging Berbick and a young McCall, Weaver has wins over an unbeaten John Tate for the WBA, win over Gerrie Coatzee, KO over Carl Williams, and a win over unbeaten James Quick Tillis. He also has wins over under rated Bernardo Mercado, and Scott Ledoux. His resume is much deeper than Busters, and while he has losses that's mostly because he was thrown to the wolves early and fought much longer than he should of. Head to Head Douglas was only better than Weaver once and while I still may rank him above when you take into account resume Weaver has the edge.
if thats the best one you got, then tunneys heayweight resume is very weak. heeney was a joke. the fact he got a title shot over sharkey and godfrey is a travesty and shows how corrupt boxing was at the time. heeney couldnt fight a lick. didnt he get stopped later on his career by guys like baer? what punchers did heeney face pre tunney?
Tunney has the better, cleaner wins at HW than Ray does. He also beat an incumbent champion, and a great one.
[/quote] Tyson H2H is at the top along with Ali in my view, and H2H is half of the ranking system. Resume wise he makes top ten as well imo. Jackson may be a bit low, I'll be honest his era is the one where I lack the most knowledge in. With Tunney, he simply didn't have enough HW fights to warrant a higher ranking. He beat a faded Dempsey twice, and only had one other HW win. Putting Tunney any higher would make it so Spinks also would belong in the top 30. I should of added Spinks somewhere in the 40s actually that was an oversight I'm surprised no one mentioned that. With Ray, he defeated young versions of Joe Walcott, and Ezzard Charles, 2 guys in my top 20. He had a huge win streak during the mid 40s and deserves to be on the list, Fitz is only one spot below him. Pure resume wise it's close between him and Ray but head to head I think he struggles a little bit more than Ray so I put him a spot lower.
I dont think so. first of all it was not a decisive knockout, it was a fight where corbett knocked fitz down and fitz grabbed on to corbetts leg to save himself from being counted out. he should have been DQed. he was badly behind on points. Ray won a clear decision over a prime jersey joe walcott in the first fight, walcott was better than corbett IMO. combine that with prime version of ezzard charles(whos better than corbett) in a very close fight that could have gone either way but rays aggresion proved superior, and you have two wins over fighters as good or better than corbett. defintley a huge edge to ray. were talking 2 wins over great fighters, versus 1 win over a great fighter. 2-1 edge. Ray has wins over savold, peaks, haynes, thomas, walker, daniels, and first thompson fight(should have been DQ) many of these men were much bigger and had more modern style than the small bareknuckller types fitz beat. But the point is thompson illegally intentionally hit ray low after taking a horrible beating, so he could get out of the fight. this in modern rules is a DQ. the fact ray couldnt continue was because he was in severe pain for his balls getting mangled up his ass by a thompson left hook. thompson should have been DQed, it was a travesty the fight was ruled a NC. sure