Name any current heavyweight that would have beat the Klitschko AJ beat?

I picked Fury to win , because Wlad looked totally shot in Jennings fight and I did not even bother predicting Wlad vs Joshua , because imo Wlad was there to cashout that’s all.
I don’t give Fury much credit and give joshua zero credit.
If Fury comes back and beats Joshua and Wilder , then I will believe he would have been competitive with prime Wlad.

 

Joshua is nothing special how many belts has he got???

 

Have a look for yourself.

https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/the-official-a-joshua-vs-w-klitschko-prediction-thread.585023/

If Wlad was shot nobody would have given him a chance.

 

Maybe ... maaaaaaybe Wilder. But only if he completely ambushed Wlad early like Joshua did in the fifth round. If Wilder boxes as cautiously and as slowly as he did in the early rounds against Ortiz then get gets boxed to a brutal KO.

 

All these people saying that wlad was totally shot are the same people who were probably saying wlad was totally useless in his prime anyway, wlad was older but i dont see anything to definitely say he was totally shot, not prime of course but still dangerous

It just says joshua was of a certain level to beat him that night, was a good win

I'm not sure wilder would have beaten even that wlad

 

Fat tub o' lard Tyson Fury beat that version of Klitschko.. so....
pretty confident in saying that Deontay and Big Baby Miller would have wrecked him.

 

The Tommies on this forum hysterically defend WK so their Hero AJ Bruno Vs 2 looks better.......

WK WAS shot......he looked like shid against the full time janitor part time boxer Jenning......let that sink in for a moment....Jennings is cannon fodder at best. Terrible fight.

Completely clowned by a unproven loud mouth Gypsy, WK was already shot there......the first sign of a shot fighter is when he cannot let his hands go anymore..........possible the WORST Heavyweight Belt scrap in decades.

Against Aj, after another two year lay off he was done beyond done..........he was pushing the jab, had no snap on his punches , his reflexes were abmysall and when he saw openings (and there were plenty) he could not pull the trigger anymore because Eye/brain to fist command was happening in slow motion.......classic sign of a shot fighter. Plus his chin and stamina were always even in his prime a liability and no surprise, his stamina and chin failed him here again.

Newsflash......he could not finish total spent Green Horn AJ off who was ready for the taking after the knock down and let him coast for several rounds.........fact not fiction.

To his credit , at least it was a entertaining fight and he did not go out in another stinker but the undeniable truth is that the K brothers claim to fame is their losses not their wins.

Conclusion, the top 5-6 guys in the division would have taken that version of WK with no problems and some of them would not have to get off the deck to get it done.

 

He had enough left in him to beat Joshua, that was clearly demonstrated during the mid rounds, and the outcome could easily have been different. Prime he would have put Joshua away.

 

Well this thread didn’t turn out as planned. The OP has once again been thoroughly owned.

 

Wilder certainly has a chance to blitz Wlad if he lands a punch but will lose most rounds where he doesn't. Parker, the guy who's best shot on AJ was a titty punch no he isn't beating that Klitschko. Ortiz I think lands a counter to get Wlad out so long as his chin holds up. Povetkin gets jabbed and grabbed again. Pulev gets blitzed. Dillion Whyte, nah. Breazeale Wlad beats on for 12 conservative rounds. Miller gets circles boxed around his concrete feet. And Takam loses as he does in all his top level fights. So he loses to two out of the top ten, not bad for a shot 41 year old.

 

I doubt any. I'd give Wilder and Ortiz decent chances. Parker a bit less so.

 

Wilder fan by any chance ?