Naseem overrated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by chrismoh, Dec 9, 2010.


  1. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
  2. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
  3. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    quite overated by the brits, but who isnt overated by the brits. just listen to them tell you what haye is going to do to the klits. this thread is filled with excuses on why nas looked like he looked against barrera and why he quit when he quit. i believe he relied on his power and reflexes to win his fights and whenn he stepped up to the top tier he saw that that was not going to be enough and his reflexes were only going to get slower.
    nas was a great entertainer and very exciting to watch. he was good for boxing and cashed in on his unique fighting style. not atg but certainly world class. i wish there were more like him today.
     
  4. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    Utter drivel ^^^
     
  5. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    No but more than good enough to be, if he didnt split with Ingle and fall out of love with the game he'd have cemented his place as an ATG with not much problems and be regarded as better than EM/MAB/JMM when looking back, i already see him on atleast equal footing with them and JMM is my fav current fighter.

    Its ashame that he has allowed the haters the ability to have misguided views about him and how good he was.

    Also correct to say that he is hated on more due to being British, thats without doubt.
     
  6. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    good ol boy.
     
  7. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    He lost to one of the best mexicans of all time..

    big deal
     
  8. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    :deal
     
  9. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Seen both, see no difference in terms of raw ability taking into account that Steve Robinson (who incidently was one of my favourite fighters EVER) was so limited, even compared to Sanchez. Against Robinson Naz had an on-day, that's all. Every fighter has one performance that makes people think that a fighter is better than they actually are.
     
  10. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    I love the way you bulk that list with worthless accomplishments :lol:. The ONLY thing of significance is the fighters he fought. He fought most of them when they were either on the way down, or the fighters weren't that good anyway, or in a weight division they didn't belong in. Paul Ingle is an exception, and his best win.
     
  11. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    without saying barrera and morales.... who did Naz duck?

    ...
     
  12. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Did you see the word "duck" in my post?
     
  13. Breakdown

    Breakdown Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,894
    0
    Nov 24, 2008
    One thing is for sure, he is great for boxing.
     
  14. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Oh, well that's true.
     
  15. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,689
    9,877
    Jun 9, 2010
    And couldn't come back from that.

    Overrated? Yes.