Nigel Benn Vs Stanley Ketchel?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jan 14, 2021.

?

Winner?

  1. Nigel Benn

    82.6%
  2. Stanley Ketchel

    17.4%
  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,584
    Yes, he wouldn`t have stood a chance v Benn fighting like this though.
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  2. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    Ketchel's problem is, that we actually have clear footage of him fighting. Which means, we don't have to rely on the testemony of old-timers, who saw him in the flesh more than 110 years ago. We can judge him with our own eyes.

    Benn early ko.
     
  3. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    3,604
    Likes Received:
    5,513
    Have to agree with Bukkake (the poster, not the practice of). I've seen a few decent length, decent quality clips of Ketchel and he looks absolutely awful.

    He worked on a farm so, despite his lack of muscular definition, he was probably very strong and mentally tough but that's about it. Balance, speed, technique, defence, co-ordination Benn looks light years ahead of him. The whole fight would resemble the 8th round of the DeWitt fight. Not pretty.

    As I have said before, different sport. Ketchel helped get boxing off the ground but nothing he does in the ring or in training resembles anything that you would expect to see from a modern fighter.
     
    Fergy and Bukkake like this.
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,194
    Likes Received:
    16,999
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,387
    Likes Received:
    50,023
    Largely in this boat.
     
    Fergy likes this.