Nigel Benn Vs Stanley Ketchel?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jan 14, 2021.


Winner?

  1. Nigel Benn

    82.6%
  2. Stanley Ketchel

    17.4%
  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Yes, he wouldn`t have stood a chance v Benn fighting like this though.
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  2. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    Ketchel's problem is, that we actually have clear footage of him fighting. Which means, we don't have to rely on the testemony of old-timers, who saw him in the flesh more than 110 years ago. We can judge him with our own eyes.

    Benn early ko.
     
  3. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,492
    5,250
    Jan 19, 2016
    Have to agree with Bukkake (the poster, not the practice of). I've seen a few decent length, decent quality clips of Ketchel and he looks absolutely awful.

    He worked on a farm so, despite his lack of muscular definition, he was probably very strong and mentally tough but that's about it. Balance, speed, technique, defence, co-ordination Benn looks light years ahead of him. The whole fight would resemble the 8th round of the DeWitt fight. Not pretty.

    As I have said before, different sport. Ketchel helped get boxing off the ground but nothing he does in the ring or in training resembles anything that you would expect to see from a modern fighter.
     
    Fergy and Bukkake like this.
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,262
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,827
    44,521
    Apr 27, 2005
    Largely in this boat.
     
    Fergy likes this.