No doubt Pacquiao was robbed, but WHY?

its MONEY, if they had awarded that fight to Pacquiao then there's no more rematch. Then Pac's next fight would be Marquez who has 50% chance of winning. Moneywise, the mafia gets more profitable by robbing Pacquiao to be followed by a rematch or even a trilogy if pac wins than fighting Marquez.

 

here we go again about Mayweather shold just fight .... This **** never stops. When he fought Corrales back when people said he stepping up,, he will get knocked out, corrales punches too hard and when Money beat him, excuse was corrales was going through a lot. Then it became fight hatton. Hatton had the style to beat him indeed, when mayweather knocked him out, excuse was now hatton was smaller and a real 140lb. Then it went to fight mosley figjht mosley after knocking out margarito, mayweather fights him and beats him up and excuse is mosley was old and already lost to pac. He destroyed ortiz excuse was he wanted out of the fight. He fought cotto at his weight not a ****ing cathweight, excuse is pac already beat him at 144 or 147, and may is slipping. Oh ya i forgot to mention marquez after 2 years the 2nd pound for pound and destroyed him when pac still can't figure him out excuse was, money was too big. No matter what mayweather does, the public will always find someone lese to throw in the mix. **** that, Maywetaher do me a favor and retire b/c these ***s on here and on other sites don't know **** about boxing!!!!!

 

I did not think the decision was robbery.

I personally scored it for Pac but it is not inconceivable for me that some saw Bradley winning.

I think Pac has slowed down significantly and I thin it is time for him to hang it up.