Official 2012 Olympic Boxing Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Jul 4, 2012.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,366
    Nov 30, 2006

    Good way of putting it. :lol:

    Robbery is a stronger term than gift, should be reserved for worse and more blatant scoring injustices.
     
  2. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    josh isn't the quickest and leads with hooks too much, i think he is more suited to the pro game but i don't think he'll be anything special.
     
  3. raymann

    raymann Guest

    im not a brit i thought it was way way too close to call, i still dont feel confident scoring amateur fights, if i had to though i would say the italian by one or two points. it certainly wasnt a robbery. close as ****.

    he looks like an amateur though and hes no more of a threat to the klits than i am. he looks well short in so many areas. he should stay as an amateur.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,366
    Nov 30, 2006
    Whoa, whoa, ishy. :shock: Never seen you this heated. :lol:

    It wasn't the robbery to end all robberies, no. There were at least a dozen worse decisions in this tourney.

    The wrong man got his hand raised, that's all.

    Cammarelle earned that (somewhat) close but clear.
     
  5. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,559
    8,119
    Sep 2, 2011
    Not a robbery but Cammarelle won it, if it was pro's I'd say Joshua deserved the victory more as the Italian looked all over the place in the third round but since it wasn't, Cammarelle seemed like the victor to me.
     
  6. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    is that sarcasm IB? :lol:
     
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    1,761
    Nov 20, 2007
    No commentary here, plenty of moments on both ends, wrong man won, but not by robbery margins but by the tightest possible.
     
  8. Matty lll

    Matty lll Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    21
    Jan 21, 2011
    Yeah, Every close fight and people starting crying robbery. Maybe because the US did so **** :think
     
  9. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    I though the 1st was bigger for Russo but at the same time the 2nd should have been closer and a clear 3d round for Joshua.

    It was 1-2 points either way. Not a robbery. Be sensible for a change.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,366
    Nov 30, 2006
    CNBC is showing a replay of Claressa Shields vs. Nadezda Torlopova in its entirety.
     
  11. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Disgraceful, simple as that.
     
  12. GrizzyBeard

    GrizzyBeard Guest

    So you would have scored the 3rd round 10-7 with pro scoring?

    The Italian clearly won the first two no matter what scoring system you used.
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,366
    Nov 30, 2006
    No, no, I dig it. We should try to get that to catch on.

    Mild cases, wrong guy won (for instance Dirrell vs. Froch, in some people's opinion) = gift.

    Severe **** where one guy dominated but lost (ie Santa Cruz vs. Casamayor) = robbery
     
  14. mclovellin87

    mclovellin87 el Terrible Full Member

    1,140
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Agree, close messy fight could have gone either way.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,366
    Nov 30, 2006
    That wasn't Russo. :lol: It was Cammarelle, far less of a douchebag than his teammate. (better style, better sportsman, better person)