Official Aussie NRL Thread

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rooster4Life, Jan 4, 2011.


  1. Dr Gonzo

    Dr Gonzo Yo! Molesta La Breastas! Full Member

    11,907
    6
    Mar 1, 2007
    :patsch
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I reckon Slater's a better attacking fullback than Lockyer was - Slater's always there to start and finish off a movement from a kick or broken play, usually resulting in a try, whereas Lockyer was more of a playmaker at fullback.
     
  3. teke

    teke Titans Time !!! Full Member

    15,472
    0
    Jul 31, 2004
    It's not really much of a contest to be honest. Slater is just pure brilliant roaming at the back
     
  4. OZ Puncher

    OZ Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,208
    1
    Aug 12, 2005
    Lockyer is the best fullback I've seen, 5/8th is a tossup between Fitler or the King... Probably edged to the King.

    This may cause some controversy.
     
  5. Rooster4Life

    Rooster4Life Easts Till I Die Full Member

    2,932
    2
    Nov 25, 2009
    count on you would take that to heart
     
  6. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    13,486
    1
    Feb 26, 2005
    Lewis was nowhere near as influential for the Broncos as Fittler was for the scum. The same applies to Johns, which further strengthens his claim that Johns was the greater player.
     
  7. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    13,486
    1
    Feb 26, 2005
    Not that there really is an argument.
    Only red faced **** soaked Queenslanders would even consider such a thing.
     
  8. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Just heard a rumour that Benji's been shagging either Fulton or Gibbs's missus and hence was punched out in training yesterday :yep

    Bye bye 2011 for the tiggers :lol:
     
  9. Dr Gonzo

    Dr Gonzo Yo! Molesta La Breastas! Full Member

    11,907
    6
    Mar 1, 2007
    ****! Hope this isnt true...
     
  10. Dr Gonzo

    Dr Gonzo Yo! Molesta La Breastas! Full Member

    11,907
    6
    Mar 1, 2007
  11. OZ Puncher

    OZ Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,208
    1
    Aug 12, 2005
    :rofl

    How unlucky that would be for the Tigers.
     
  12. JustinD

    JustinD Member Full Member

    453
    0
    Mar 21, 2007
    So you'd get rid of Soward but keep King?

    You can't break up the halves after one game, considering how badly the NSW front row was beaten.
     
  13. rusty nails

    rusty nails Tszyu for PM!! Full Member

    6,300
    10
    Jun 20, 2008
    lockyers hard to rate because even though he wore the number one he only played half the game there. he played fullback in defense and 5/8 in attack.
    So i guess you could say he was a more creative and versatile fullback than slater but thats not really the conventional fullbacks role.
     
  14. rusty nails

    rusty nails Tszyu for PM!! Full Member

    6,300
    10
    Jun 20, 2008
    It was clearly the blues game plan to use pierce more and take the pressure off soward
    (whose kicking game kept the blues in the contest :deal)
     
  15. OZ Puncher

    OZ Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,208
    1
    Aug 12, 2005
    Wish everyone would lay off them. FFS they played a ****ing fantastic game, considering some calls went against us, we got in front after a brutal onslaught of QLD attach... WE are far from out of this competition, this is our best chance of the past 5 years to win, at least we have players in the correct position etc.

    Only change I would make was King for Learoyd Lars.

    On a lighter note, Tim Mannah is going to be the next best Forward in the game. Outstanding player.