The game has changed as did all sports. I dont get the hate though. Linebackers of the 40's were slower an not nearly as strong(drug protocols have changed not diet and advanced training) Who knows how they would have done today.
I have a **** load of ******ed posts and threads, I admit this. But even I'm not stupid and ******ed enough to believe a PRIME LEWIS loses to a Prime Wladimir.... and 'anyone with a brain knows this' or Lewis will 'spark Ali' these quotes of yours far surpass anything any ****** on this forum have said and that includes all the *******s, *****s, Chavez Jr Fans, Klittards and Stewmos. Your dumb ****ing ******ation is now p4p rank 1. Even the most hardcore of Klit lickers if you ask them to answer honestly will admit Prime Lennox vs Prime Wladimir is a 50 50 fight. Go ask that poster 'Jisi' about prime Lewis vs Prime Wladimir. You are talking about Lewis as if he was from some black and white ****ing era. He's just as big as Wladimir, more cut, just as powerful, just as athletic, and meaner. Not to mention slicker. You are a ****ing moron. You are also old.
Being that most people here consider me a Floyd Mayweather Jr fan - I find that ironic. You can't, you can just listen/read/review articles of those who are and make your decision based on that. Anyone viewing clips of the past in real time notice how slow the action is, how slow the fighters are and how untuned their bodies are. The people getting angry in the idea that Wlad beats Lennox make me laugh, Wlad has a better all round arsenal, the reach advantage, potentially a better jab and isn't prone to being caught by the overhand right that Lewis made his household name with. Quite simply, Wlad can keep Lewis on the outside with his jab and make it count with the better quality he has with his hooks and straight right. Both are "chinny" fighters so lets not pretend Wlad can't knock Lewis out.
and let's not pretend Lewis can't knock Wlad out. 50 50 fight at best for Wlad. Also Lewis have proven he got a better chin then Wlad. and stfu about ur Floyd bull**** You are a racist moron there are only 3 kinds of people that will say Klithsckos are better then Lewis 1- Racist or hidden racists who hates Blacks 2- Self Loathing Blacks 3- People who hate British Fighters you are one of the 3
Yet we saw Vitali who isn't as good of a fighter in his prime as Wladimir is ( despite having a more exciting style and harder punchers ) out box Lennox Lewis through six rounds and only be retired due to a cut/injury. Yet we've seen Wladimir Klitschko in his prime dominate fighters to a bigger extent than Lennox Lewis managed to do (in all but one case, against David Tua) Lennox never dominated his sport in the way Wladimir Klitshcko has and that's a fact. Anyone who ignores that has some sort of mental issue evidenced by them also attempting to claim racism over the top of it. OK Genius - tell me the game plan that Lennox Lewis uses to beat Wladimir Klitschko. Tell me how Ali or Holmes beat Lennox. What's the gameplan? Don't be a ****ing mook on this either.
I wanna push you off of that boat... Film has changed dip****. Of course the timing is off. Even then name a fighter walcotts weight. that today looks better of more fundamentally sound then him.
"Film has changed" - but slow looping punches that take a mile of time to connect are apparently quicker despite the fact that we can review baseball on the same style of camera and realise that a Nolan Ryan 100mph fastball looked just as fast on the cameras in that day as a 100mph fast ball looks today. Cmon, don't be a ****ing goon - you can't argue against fact that punches from a George Foreman were much slower than even Sam Peter's slow wide punches. We can review fight footage and see that, there is no recourse for argument.
Your real motive for taking up for Mayweather is so you can take up for Calzaghe.....with someone as therapeutic as myself,your posting motives are very clear to me Blonde Batman.:thumbsup
If you want to learn more about boxers and their resumes, you have to research their opponents in as much depth as you can. This can be a long tiresome affair, but rather rewarding. The easiest way to learn about Wilde - pick up his book. If you dot fancy that, read my article on him which Mo quoted. If you find yourself interested, the BBC has a great radio interview with Wilde on their website
You really are a fool an dont know **** about the game you yuppie ******. You just compared sam peter to george ****ing foreman. go sit in a corner. Foreman had his own style an he was effective with it. You see what he did to frazier. you know ****.