p4p above 147

whoops, got you confused with wg2

All you guys with black guy avatars look alike :yep

and btw, did you really think calling me soft over the internet means a damn thing? You can insult my opinions/ideas/ or what i write.

But to call me soft over the internet, honestly what does that really accomplish? Does that make you feel better? Are you now tougher?

Oh my, i think your badass level went up by 5 points :scaredas:

 

Thank you for giving a logical answer.. (unlike Vanillakiller)

Fair enough...I see what...I dont agree with those who say because you're a heavy weight you shouldnt be on the P4P list...My understanding of pound for pound is that if two fighters was the same size despite weight classes...Who would.>>>>>Having said that its based on skills alone that earns you that spot so to say that HW shouldnt be on there is wrong IMO...If you have the skill then you're P4P material IMO...

I only brought up Williams because he tends to level the fields by neglecting his height and try to outbox\outhustle you.

I got your point though!:good

 

Well these guys have way more natural talent than just height. Comparing the Klitschkos to Hearns? atsch

Klitsckos are good fighters and great sportsman. But not P4P.

 

Wow, look at all the clueless posters with Wlad and Vitali in the top 3.

 

Dude you're the one who said I dont like white fighters!

What are you talking about...I was holding a decent conversation with you, but because you went left field on me...I was just speaking my mind because you wanted come off as an *******...If you meant to say that WG2 then I apologize, but as it seems at first...You quoted me and I responed in that matter.

Like I said, if you meant to aim that at somebody else then I do apoligze.:good

 

Here my list

1 Hop
2 P Will
3 Dawson
4 Waldo
5 Haye
6 Vitali
7 Ward
8 Adamek
9 Pavlik
10 erdei i guess :huh

 

Nope. Ask yourself this question? If either of the Klits fought Hopkins, RJJ,
or even Pacman just for the fun of it. If they were the same size of these fighters, do you think they are better skilled boxers to come out with the victory?

That is what p4p means.

 

I am only answering Vanillakillas very illogical comparison of Hearns being tall and the Klits being tall. They had completely different fighting styles.

And I understand current p4p, and that is what I am basing my answer on.

 

I put a lot of emphasis on domination and ring generalship. Either guy would find success at lower weights using their respected styles. Height and weight is not the only reason for them winning

 

That pawing jab of the Klits would be blitzed by a Pacman flurry, or nullified by Hopkins or Mayweathers master defense. Tell me what other good weapons besides the jab and overhand right do the Klits have?

They have No footwork, no speed, no defense, besides being tall and out of range always. They have minimal skills in a very tall and lengthy reach thats it.

 

Chad Dawson is #1 hands down.

 

Dawson or Hopkins currently.

 

Considering Sergio, just beat PWill, that's a really bad list.