hmm... so you have it a very close 114-113 decision for jmm, so not a clear decision in any way. this just bolsters the fact that the fight was that close and could've gone either way. i had it 6-6 with the KD the difference. but it could have been also 7-5 for pac if i gave him the very close 7th round which i ended up giving to jmm instead.
NO, the general concensus is that JMM deserved the decision. I would be a lot more worried if a Bob Arum were the owner of Ring Mag, DLH does not go around telling bull**** everywhere, and thus I don't think anybody has noticed any changes in The Ring. *******s were praising it for stating that Pacquiao would receive the #1 p4p spot if he KOed Barrera but now the table changes when its convenient. Finally I agree with Divac and the rest. The *******s love to dish it out and can't take it when it comes back to them. What goes around comes around.
if that match was a draw or was given to jmm by a point, then you'd be hearing about us pacfans demading that the second KD (when jmm held the ropes) in round three be counted (10-7 round for pac). or maybe a point deduction for the illegal use of a foreign object to close jmm's cut. let this rest guys. this thread aint worth **** because DIVAC DOES NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN THE **** HE POSTED. HE ALREADY SAID HE DOES NOT CONSIDER PAC A COWARD. let him live in his own world. you gratify him with your replies
no. the general consensus, leaving out both jmm and pac fans is that it was a very close fight which could've gone either way. you're definitely a jmm fan so i don't expect you to accept this. hmm... i didn't know ring mag was going to award pac #1 p4p if he ko'd barrera in the second fight. but imho, i still wouldn't put pac at #1 even if it happened. barrera is already a spent force and i don't think he was rated in the top 10 p4p at that time. not even a KO victory against barrera in the second fight would have enhanced pac's p4p standing. on the other hand, even a very close victory against #3 p4p jmm certainly did. it gave pac his 4th belt in 4 weight classes and his 3rd lineal title in 3 weight divisions. it solidified his hold @ #2 p4p and improved his standing on the ATG list.
hmm... so why has pac fought him 2X already? :-( you can't definitely say the same thing about barrera, morales and even hamed for that matter. another jmmoron surfaces its ugly head. atsch
I love how Divac uses public opinion as if he knows what everyone thinks. He chooses select people who agrees with him and calls it public opinion.
prob is that those polls also include mexican boxing fans who would understandably side w/ jmm. they are in great abundance here in esb. prob w/ polls concerning pac and jmm is that their fans will always skew the results one way or the other.
The most telling point that convinces me that the "majority" thought JMM should have been the victor is how many real pinoy boxing fans admitted to scoring the fight for JMM:deal
jeez just what is the point of this thread. This thread has lost it and it turn out to be a fan bashing of jmm-pac. Anything that is said here won't change a damn thing, i don't know why divac would insist on this so and so non stop. Now before you quote me as a pacfan, i'm a boxing fan. Heck spinks was robbed and i don't see **** flying around, the dawson-johnson fight was also viewed as a robbery but i don't see any **** flying and that was more recent than this almost 2 month old fight before. Just because of 2 *******s(you all know who are they)..why the hate? I don't get it..