Pac Fighting David Diaz is Ridiculous

Your posts are totally wrong throughout this thread. For some reason whenever anyone starts a debate with you, you never listen to reason. To make things worse, you post ridiculous emoticons at the end of every post that have no relevance to what you have said. It makes your posts look very inconclusive, as if you are relying on silly emoticons to make points that you simply could not. Pac lost to Morales the first time, and beat faded legends after that, coming off losses. If you can't see that you have fallen into the category of a nut hugger plain and simple. His best win against a genuine HOF who was not out of their prime was MAB the first time. Great win, but I for one have not been nearly as impressed as some since that time.

 

No you're the one reading. If there are no rematches against the old bums you're calling . . . Pac won't be where he is now it's that simple.:yep

You can't justify Guzman being the best choice as opponent for PaC at this point. The guy has no stature to bring . . . bottom line.

 

Really? It's bottom line now? He is a better fighter than David Diaz. There's a bottom line. You keep talking about stature but then equating it to money or plans....being an unbeaten champion isn't better than a no name title holder? What universe?

 

Nah nah nah :-( . . . I was already saying "out of the prime legends" so I'm not implying that these fighters can beat Guzman now . . . What I'm exlpaining here is even if MAB or Morales s already old and out of their primes . . . it is those fights or rematches that makes Pac what he is now.
Stature man . . . stature.

And I'm up to Pac fighting JMM next not Guzman . . . what's his stature?

 

And I am not implying anything. I am telling you they weren't "the best". You keep changing the context of the argument. Who here is talking about stature? Not me. I am talking about competition level, simple as.

What's David Diaz's stature? One loss belt holder who barely beat a shot Morales. He has no stature. The problem isn't Pacquiao fighting JMM instead of Guzman or Valero. He is a better fighter than them in most people's opinions. But David Diaz is not. Stop talking about something thats not on the table. You are arguing a point that isn't part of the argument.

 

:-(

He maybe the best fighter than everybody else but bottom line is he is not on the radar of Pac team. It's now Diaz or JMM. :yep

A no name title holder who can give Pac a belt at the next weight division AND will give him more money be always better than Guzman.

 

Oh...now you're speculating. And your saying "not on the radar' only makes it worse. How did David Diaz get on the radar?

And lastly, you have no clue as to how much money Pacquaio would make fighting David Diaz. Bottom line is he is the weaker fighter, and you just proved my point. I don't care about all this other Pac-nonsense about who he can make the most fighting for the least risk. I never want to read another Pacquiao fan criticize PBF for his competition or fighting for money like you were before.

 

Well no matter how you discredit David Diaz, he is a belt holder at the next higher weight. And any lower weight class fighter who climbs up to fight a title holder in the next division will always get more credit than fighting a champion at his regular weight class. Even if that champion have 12 loses.

Only people with other motives will not realize that. :yep

 

Speculating? Nah . . . Pacquaio against a tomato can will always make money . . . what more when he is fighting a Mexican which has a large fanbase in U.S.

You can ask Arum and team Pac on why and how Davis Diaz is on their radar while Guzman is not. It didn't come from me, it's on the written articles. :yep

 

More fabrication and speculation. Your motive is to make Pacquiao look good no matter what. You're failing. You don't always get more credit for going up and fighting another champion as opposed to the champion in your division. PBF certainly didn't get more credit for going up and fighting DLH than he would have for fighting Cotto. Or for fight Baldomir or Judah instead of fighting Hatton at 140. That's pretty transparent.

How did I discredit Diaz? Its a fact that he barely beat Morales. It's a fact that Morales had lost 4 of his prior 5 fights. That's the truth. Why are you trying so desperately to spin it?

 

David Diaz has no fanbase here. If anything, the mexicans dislike him because they think Morales won lol.

I don't care why Guzman isn't on the radar. Don't care for your explanation either. Point is, it's pathetic.

Also, you further proved my point. If Pacquiao can make money fighting a tomato can, then he should fight the best fighters and not be as concerned about who he can make the most against. He will make money anyways RIGHT?

 

Well I'm for the JMM/PAC FIGHT by all means. :yep

That's the best fight for him now. Need to settle what needs to be settled before planning anything else.

 

Exactly. That was a transparent argument.