STFU already, you're more annoying than Farmboxer on a caffeine rush. atsch Pernell Whiatker is much, much, much more accomplished at 147 than Pacquiao is and probably will ever be dumb mother****er! atsch Pacquiao has NOT become a better boxer since fighting JMM. His level of opposition has however been LOWER. So taking into account that Pacquiao's level of opposition has been lower than JMM at 140 and 147, then YES we can use JMM as a measuring stick considering he is the closest to Whitaker in terms of boxing skill stupid twat. At 147 Pac has beat a shot weight drained 36 year old DLH, and Miguel Cotto. Try ranking Miguel Cotto next to SRR, SRL, Duran, Sal Sanchez, Chavez, Hearns, Hagler, Pep, W. Gomez. Now Rank Whitaker next to those names. See the difference in caliber fighter stupid **** head?? atsch Like I said, if JMM can win more than 6 rounds in each of Pac's fights, then Whitaker, who is a steps above JMM, can defitnately school Pac.
So what are you saying? That Pac's level of opposition has gotten better, or that he boxing skills have improved? :think On a side note, you're obviously you're an alias, more than likely run-offed ESB for being a dumb dip****, or banned for the same reason.
Oscar has fought and beat more quality opposition. All of Oscar losses were against P4P fighters. All of Pacquiao's losses have been to journeymen and a shot fighter. You take it for what it is. If you'd like, I can break down their resumes, and I can breakdown their too, and we shall see which argument is more persuasive.