No, for the simple reason, you post like a stupid kid. You made no valid points, not even an attempt. You're just a **** talking punk who think they know more then they will ever produce. But you will be loud and annoying I'm sure. And other idiots will agree with you, making you think you are smart. You aren't... :roll:
This is too stupid to go 10 pages... BTW, where's your outrage over what the stupid Floyd fanboys say, unless you agree with him.:hey Isn't that what you say to me all the time?:rofl Just messing with you...
"Pacquiao's a cherry picker" Who did he duck? "Uhh..." "Pacquiao shouldn't be P4P #1" Who should be P4P #1 instead? "Uhh....."
:thumbsup http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=278105 http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294560
When your opinion regarding P4P rankings acutally matter I am sure Ring will notify you with an offer of employement until then go back to living in your moms basement.
its pretty true, he hasnt fought anyone in their prime since jmm. hatton already lost to floyd. cotto lost to margarito
at least he doesnt fight fighters, who's confidence has been brutalised by a vicious beating recently
that doesnt make them shot though, thats like saying if anyone beats pac know it isnt impressive cause it has been done 3 times already.
not really... pacs losses are ancient... Shanes loss isnt, neither was Haton or ODHs... best fighter in the world? pfff... if he's the best, why doesnt he fight the best fighters around his weight, like a Sergio??
Pacman is necessary for boxing man. In as much as you may think he is a cheater, or he is doped up whatever he is giving this sport a lot of press and making boxing stay "relevant" to the minds of casual fans who just want to see instant action gratification. Nothing wrong with him boxing. Its good for him to be around and above all, he is good for the sport