Pacquiao has never lost to a black fighter!

he might lose his 1st against Tim Bradley..

 

Well that's because all the great black boxers that should beat Pac easily are in the NBA and NFL.

Wait... that's the Klitschko excuse.

Nevermind. My bad.


:rofl:nut

 

Go back under your alts you slimy, corny fat ass midget ******.

 

another idiot confusing race to a nationality like floyd.

 

Not overly, but your powers of comprohension make me want to cry :-(

 

I've never had an alt before. I use the same account for serious and non-serious discussions.

Hi Nallege!

 

Shut the **** up you dumb, fat mother****er.

 

Mother****er you use a couple of alts. Lying mother****er.

 

Why would I need to use an alt? Why would I need an alt when I can make some legendary threads that infuriate others under the great Caneman account?

Others need alts so they can do what I do on a regular basis on my account and still act credible on their regular accounts.

 

this plus that guy isn't a SLICK black fighter, nor is Timmy. Pac has never fought a SLICK black fighter and never will!!! He knows better than to risk it. You see what JMM did to him? I wouldn't want anything to do with Mayweather either if I was him

 

Your ****** ass isn't infuriating anyone with common sense you cocksucking lying, ugly short *******, lmfao!

 

Really now?

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=325298[/url]

This content is protected

Why are fans of 'The Sweet Science' (Floyd/Bhop fans) slow to defend the Klitschkos?

Many boxing fans hate the Klitschkos for being dominant but at the same time not overextending themselves (being too cautious - AKA being boring).

Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Bernard Hopkins sometimes gets hated for the very same reason, being too defensive minded and not willing to engage enough to catch the interest of some fans who want to see slugfests. Floyd and Bhop's fans swear by their style as pure boxers, those who practice 'The Sweet Science' - the art of hitting without getting hit.

Although the Klitschkos are nowhere near as slick defensively as Floyd or Bernard, they have similar philosophies in not presenting their opponents very much opportunities to hit them while jabbing their way throughout the fight with some occasional power punching until their opponents have been broken down and ready to be KO'd or have fallen behind on the scorecards enroute to a UD loss.

My question is, why don't we see Floyd/Bhop fans defending the Klitsckos from their haters for fighting a very smart efficient boxing style with safety in mind and being very dominant with their results, which these fighters all have in common?

[url]

This content is protected

[/url]

Is Floyd REALLY good for boxing?

[url]

This content is protected

[/url]

Does Floyd really run?

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=325585[/url]

This content is protected

what similarities are there between Floyd and Wlad? none

 

Pac skipped 4th grade through high school and went on to college. Some people learn faster than others.

:good