Marquez won both fights. But for the 1st round of the 1st fight it wasnt even competitive. The 2nd fight was closer, but still Marquez won, and didnt about 98% of the ringside media agree! Pacs a great fighter, but Marquez had his number.
Every time I score it I have it 114-114. However, I scored the 1st round 10-10 and I think most people seem to have scored it 10-9 Pacquiao (I know Lederman did), so I don't think 114-113 Pacman is out of the question. But it's a D for me.
atsch You obviously haven't even seen that fight. I had it 115-112 Pacquiao, it was a very close and competitive fight but Pac coasts home on the basis of a 10-6 opening round. I cannot understand how this absurd myth about Marquez dominating after the 1st round has come about, it's complete nonsense. Watch the ****ing fight - it doesn't happen!! :nut
I've not once given Pacquiao the win if I remember correctly. Always Marquez by 1 point, or a draw. A very hard bout to judge, and is the reason why I get a different outcome every time.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
I have marquez winning four rounds in a row from round 3 on. After that close round 7 they are basically both winning rounds.
This is what I like about the fight its a very close fight that a lot of people score differently. However when a person calls both fighst a robbery then that person is a idiot in my eyes. Just 2 close fights that could have gone eitehr way:thumbsup
If you re-scored the fight by watching the video again, then you have to count 2 knockdowns. JMM cling to the ropes and that is a knockdown. You simply can not re-score the fight again by rewatching the fight and score rounds for JMM because the video is showing it as like that and then when you reach the part where he clung to the rope, fast forward it as if it never happened. What is the purpose of re-scoring it then if it favors one fighter. Example - Pac - Mab 1, round one, Pac was "KD" when obviously it was a slip. When you rewatch it to score it, would you still rule it a knockdown? If the answer is yes, then you should just stick to the original judges scorecards.
Juanita fans are still crying about the loses? LOL Move on bitches. Marquez is gonna be irrelevant soon enough and he's the only cash cow GBP has on their stable.
I understand why people say JMM eventhough i thought paquiao won...still thats no reason for a 3rd fight, their legacies will live on forever i just dont want it ruined with a 3rd pointless fight in this stage of their careers.
This is intersting because many people thought Marquez won rounds 1,7 & 11. but i think you should watch these videos for a more accurate scoring.. Round 1 - http://youtu.be/rW740sPKlQk Round 7 - http://youtu.be/-j_QELzaVdE Round 11 - http://youtu.be/LC_9SRwfIbU