Pacquiao - Marquez III - No robbery

pac dictated the pace of the fight, landed more. jmm chose to land one or 2 and was content with that after pac landed more on him. i was like he aint gonna beat pac if he doesnt throw more punches. judges r quick to see that

 

I also like when people say JMM "ran"lol. Mosley ran most of the time though he did turn him and did have the right open all night but almost never took it because he can't pull the trigger anymore and he was scared. JMM countered him most of the fight and you could tell Manny was frustrated and after the fight he cried knowing deep down he lost. How do counterpunchers fight again? They stay in distance picking their opponent off. People get caught up in who won(Marquez people!!!lol) but rarely bring up that it was a very good fight. Nice way to close the trilogy performance-wise however you judge the fights(Ummm Marquez!lol). All jokes aside much respect to both men for the battles of the first two fights and the very watchable chess match in the third.

 

see philla...i didn't even include the fan poll-the fan poll had MORE THAN 9 OUTTA 10 WINNING IT/DRAW FOR JMM-



I'm simply stating that the AVERAGE for a poll is between 7-8 having it for JMM....



U said you called me out..well looking at these 2 polls, which are both a part of my source-u did not call **** out of anything-u were owned Philla-



The fan poll only furthers my sources behind my opinion.

 

This is how *******s operate.

They pulled the same crap after the 2nd fight.
The great majority had Marquez winning that fight as well.

*******s will continue to attempt to rehash and disuss whats already been discussed at nauseum.

Their logic being that the further removed from the fight, the more the neutral fight fan stays away from a thread like this, and the more they can actually get their own *******ed allies to stomach being able to defend what they wanted very badly for it to be, a Pacquiao victory.

You just watch. If Pacquiao easily beats Bradley, there will be more posters willing to side he beat Marquez as well.

The further removed from the fight, the more they can convince and lie to themselves that they did'nt really witness Marquez propinate the boxing lesson that he did.

If lieing to themselves makes the ******* feel better, so be it
I guess they're entitled to wish for what they want.

 

u dont understand it do u-

u do realize u still have to score the shot...even if IN YOUR OPINION, it landed on the back of the head?

0 warning issued and Pac was moving on the punch-so you still have to score it and IT WAS THE BEST PUNCH OF THE ROUND.

See, this is why I can tell u dont follow much of the sport-u dont even know much of the rules-u just post with nothing to back it-so score the shot and how do u have it now?

 

Most Pac fans tends to say it was close and could have went both ways. I am not sure about the underlying mental processes behind this, but there is nothing strange about boxing fans expressing an opinion about a great fight on a boxing Internet message board.

Personally I respect that people scored it for JMM, but I find his performence beeing overrated and I dont think giving him nine rounds are justifiable.

 

According to *******s they are all jealous of Pacquiao. :yep

 

Dont score fights on:

1. Facial bruising.

2. Comments from trainers.

3. Facial expression of fighters.

4. Facial expression of fighters girlfriends.

5. Personal mindreading abillities.

Thank you.

 

Pacquiao - Marquez III - Yes robbery

/thread

 

Ledderman actualy said during the fight, that if the amount of punches landed are close in number, that he will decide the winner of the round based on amount of punches thrown and bruising on the face..>WTF????!! atschatschatsch

WOW.

 

When did I say I scored the fight on that? I scored the fight on Marquez landing the better shots, having the pace go his way, and Pacq's frustration that Marquez wasn't going to let Pacq tee off on him. Through all that I said the fight was good and both guys deserve credit for the series yet you ignored that.

 

Leaderman also gave Alexander 117-111 against Kotelnik. Since then I held and still hold no importance to the HBO scorecard or Showtime scorecard though they seem to be more reasonable in their judging.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=358270

 

I'll make a not of never refearing to his scorecard to win a debate, I think. It could backfire real damn fast.