Pac's win over Hatton in retrospect after last night

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Aug 23, 2009.


  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    47,355
    14,504
    Mar 5, 2006
    Pac's way better p4p than any of the current sh*t fighters from the UK.
     
  2. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Paulie would never have the power to beat Hatton. You have to be either stronger than Hatton and a good inside fighter or you have to be faster and have power. Hatton is not that easy to beat in the ring. In theory, hell yeah he is easy. But executing its hard b/c he does smother and pressure.
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    yeah, but you have to see difference in levels when you see one. do you think that either malignaggi or diaz would beat pac? this time, A>B>C>D works.
     
  4. jjax

    jjax Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    wow you're such a nice guy! here's my credit card, passport, social insurance number and bank statement. i fully trust some random internet bozo who's never publicly posted his picks to be a gambling superstar and a trustworthy business associate.
     
  5. jjax

    jjax Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    go ahead boom boom, im sure a guy whose avatar is a picture of pirate pacman in his underwear will be a perfectly reasonable debater
     
  6. Dear Leader

    Dear Leader Member Full Member

    368
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    I don't think any version of Malignaggi would've beaten Hatton because he'd still be featherfisted which was a big factor in the Hatton fight.
     
  7. daydachamp

    daydachamp Active Member Full Member

    604
    0
    Jun 18, 2009
    random with a name like mine? publicly post my picks? you want the business partner who tips his hand when he's got the nuts OR the guy who slow plays it for all its worth? you want to know who's going to win next week? i'll take your credit card, passport, social insurance number and bank statement. and in the end you'd still be thanking me because i am a really nice guy gambling superstar and i'll return each to you fatter than wence they showed up
     
  8. newrp01

    newrp01 Active Member Full Member

    504
    0
    Aug 3, 2004
    Hatton is not a bum... he's a very well matched b- fighter. He has also benefited from poor refereeing.
     
  9. hopkins54

    hopkins54 Active Member Full Member

    776
    0
    Feb 13, 2008
    also malignaggi was poisened
    also malignaggi was weightdrained
    also malignaggi never had the right socks on
    etc etc
     
  10. hopkins54

    hopkins54 Active Member Full Member

    776
    0
    Feb 13, 2008
    so what level of fighters are are diaz and malignaggi??
     
  11. Back Hand Slap

    Back Hand Slap Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    Jul 18, 2009
    I agree, Hatton was still a very dangerous, top fighter. His gameplan was all wrong against Pacquiao, and pacs style is basically Hatton's kryptonite. A fast,powerful and diverse southpaw.
     
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Maybe the worst post I have ever read from you...Its what I expect from Kessler fans not from you...
     
  13. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    964
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    What a dumb thread. Paulie from yesterday was not Paulie from November.
     
  14. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,944
    6,269
    May 18, 2006
    Paulie will look good agaisnt power puff. no doubt..Hatton hits hard and he felt it he got damaged in that fight as well as the cotto fight.I reckon put him in a puncher ya'll see the same Paulie.He'll look pretty with Diaz. Put him with a damaging puncher, as soon as he get's hit hard it's all down hill from there.
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Pretty much. The community lemmings have knee-jerked into this position that Hatton is, and always was, completely garbage for some laughable reason because Pacquiao put him away so quickly and easily. There is an unofficial rule in the mind of these people that if a fighter is beaten by early knockout he's instantly crap. I wouldn't say that Hatton was at the top of his game though. Pacquiao would have been way too much regardless. Too much power, too much speed.