Parker laughs at AJ offer

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by liger1992, Nov 13, 2017.


  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,457
    Jan 10, 2007
    About resumes.

    Parker's resume isn't that bad actually. Surely AJ has win over Wlad, and that makes the biggest difference.

    Other than that, AJ beat Takam, Whyte, Breazeale. Certainly not better than Parker's best wins - Takam, Ruiz jr, and Fury.

    Wlad paid Haye and Ibragimov 50% both to get their belts, and he had at that time much deeper resume than both.

    But I know it's all about money. AJ is a much bigger draw, so his share should be bigger without a question. Not a 80-20 though.
     
  2. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,699
    4,785
    Jul 6, 2014
    AJ shouldnt have to take a paycut for a fight he brings all the money too in order to fund Parkers retirement.

    Parker - do what normal people do when a clear b side. Take the 6/7 mil and go and try and win the fight. Then rematch for 20 mil!
     
    gmurphy, Gneus7 and Mr Icaman like this.
  3. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,065
    6,500
    Feb 20, 2009
    If the money isn't there, don't take the fight.

    Both Parker & Joshua have other options, so no biggie.

    Parker v Lucas Browne in Melbourne is a natural.

    If Joshua doesn't fight Wilder next up, it's gotta be Big Baby, doesn't it?
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
  4. liger1992

    liger1992 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,172
    1,360
    Mar 29, 2015
    Haye brought UK ppv money to the table for the Wlad fight.
     
  5. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    70/30 is fair for either Parker or Wilder to fight Joshua.

    That's still probably over $15million+ as the B-side
     
  6. liger1992

    liger1992 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,172
    1,360
    Mar 29, 2015
    This. If AJ makes £10-£15 mil fighting Takam then why should he not be earning more to fight Parker or Wilder. They all want to earn much more than usual expecting AJ to not get his fair share.

    Parker needs to get real. His last defence in the UK was on YouTube.
     
  7. The Clan

    The Clan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,497
    2,080
    Nov 11, 2007
    Hearn should offer Parker or Wilder a flat fee, no percentage, no share of the PPV sales just a cast iron guaranteed purse with no risk attached.

    Parker £7.5 Million = to NZ $14.25 Million
    also = to around 7X Parker’s biggest ever purse
    with a rematch clause

    Wilder £10 Million = to US $13,1 Million
    also = to around 9X Wilders biggest ever purse
    with a rematch clause

    Publicise the hell out of the offers then wait for either camp to accept or decline
     
  8. Rockradar

    Rockradar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,244
    1,349
    Oct 1, 2016
    Joshua isn't able to fight Parker because Joshua wont give Parker less money than Joshua is receiving should they fight. Team Joshua are trying to give Parker lesser money. Thats it in a nutshell.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
  9. Rockradar

    Rockradar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,244
    1,349
    Oct 1, 2016
    Once Wilder hears about this, he too will start pushing for 40%.
     
  10. uppercut_to_the_body

    uppercut_to_the_body Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    2,384
    Sep 19, 2017
    Higgins wants to snort the full 40%, nothing less

    Parker needs to ditch this clown asap
     
  11. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,711
    Aug 7, 2010
    Makes you wonder if Wilder and Parker have outgrown their devious greedy little promoters. Hearn is taking on fighters for his UK and US stables. They should get in there.
     
  12. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,338
    Feb 4, 2012
    Higgins is a joke. Look at how he went on during the Fury build up. The fact that Parker get messed around the way he did and then STILL had to travel to face a guy who couldn't draw a cartoon lets you know everything you need to know about him as a promoter.

    I mean what did he get for that defence? He's going to get a whole load more against Joshua but expecting 40% of the revenue is wishful thinking IMO.
     
  13. Baneofthegame

    Baneofthegame Active Member Full Member

    1,136
    1,126
    Aug 19, 2017
    In the quote he talks about:

    "disrespecting every kid who ever wanted to win a world title and set his family up for life"

    Not exactly the most encouraging words from your own promoter, basically making it sound like a cash out.
     
  14. NakiFan

    NakiFan Proud Kiwi Guy Full Member

    2,294
    1,015
    Dec 5, 2015
    You guys are getting too hungup on the words that Higgins spews...for those who have followed Higgins and the Duco team since Tua vs Cameron, Higgins ALWAYS goes overboard. It's his personality.
    This is simply Higgins flexing his "muscles" to get serious negotiations happening. I firmly believe if Hearn and Higgins both sit down, a figure around 65-35 would be worked out and agreed upon.

    Hearn is doing the same thing, by announcing Miller vs Joshua in "2018". Trying to get Duco to speed things up.

    Personally I don't see unifications happening until Joshua fights a couple more top 20 blokes without issues, slowly eroding the PPV fans excitement, therefore forcing Hearn to look at unification in late 2018 or early 2019.
     
  15. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,514
    3,623
    Apr 11, 2010
    70/30 and both should be realistic, that is what they are worth.

    80/20 or 75/25 and I think they can rightfully turn their nose up a little bit
    80/20 is especially disrespectful, 75/25 is probably not the end of the world but maybe a bare minimum IMO
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
    NakiFan likes this.