Paulie was robbed.

Paulie didn't win the first six anything. that wasn't the amateurs, it was a professional fight and all that hitting on the shoulders and arms with no effect was garbage. It wasn't a runaway victory but it was clear. Broner punished his ass, took his belt and his side piece. I can understand the whining cause Paulie was whining so loud he sounded like a siren. I don't know who was whining the loudest, Paulie or Periban.

 

Who ever feel paulie won all the first 6 rounds should never ever score the fight again. Paulie was winning the early rounds but i think in round 3 or 4 broner won that round clearly. It was like zab vs floyd early rounds but then later on broner was landing hard shots alot that has paulie wobble just alittle. Broner clearly won the fight 116-112 in my card. Broner comments after the fight was disgusting.

 

Sorry can't call that a robbery.

When it is genuinely plausible any of 3 outcomes could be acceptable then robbery simply cannot be used.

Now it starting to become very very obvious that Broner won't be allowed to lose a close fight is a different story.

 

Even all showtime crew that paulie works with even had broner winning the fight.

 

Malignaggi wobbled on a left hook at the beginning of round 3 and received all the hard shots.

 

Paulie was robbed

 

For Me a Clear Draw = Rematch !!!

 

You're a dumb a$$

 

i wanted paulie to win but the fight was close, no problem with broner getting the W.

 

Scored it 115-113 Broner. Pretty easy to score round by round actually.

 

Broner is the biggest hypejob in the sport. A shot Hatton who everyone claims was **** dominated a prime Paulie for 11 rounds, Broner edged past a washed up Paulie but is meant to be the next Floyd/Pacquiao.

 

I metioned on a thread I started last week that Broner was teh biggest Hypejob in boxing and I think That fight showed why. He is never going to be elite, he has zero class and his skills are no where near as good as he thinks they are. If he had fought Paulie even 12 months ago it would have been even closer perhaps even getting a clear decision. I had Broner winning by a round but that was not counting the points that should have been taken off.

 

scored it 115 - 113 for broner, butt!
1. contender should look better
2. broner also fought pretty dirty.

Broner won, but he is a piece of **** and a B-level fighter, who will get exposed by a whole bunch of fighters(alexander, matthysse, pacquaio, mayweather, bradley, hell, even maybe judah could beat him)

 

Had it 115-113 Paulie. Multiple fouls also were not called on Broner.

 

From Russia, I had same score on my card but Broner should have had 1 definite possibly as many as 3 points deducted which would have gave Paulie a clear win. I still feel regardless of my card if it was teh othe rway around and Broner was belt holder and Paulie challenging Broner would have still got the decision with Paulie up 2 rounds.

I dont even see the appeal for GBP to keep protecting this guy he has no class, no charisma he is a grade A cuunt who will never be more than a B level fighter