Pavlik or Abraham

You haven´t seen his fight with Koren Ghevor then. Ghevor swarmed over Abraham for every second of every round.

BS. Abraham is the better ring general, has the better defence - not only his shell but also his upperbody movement and footwork - and the better chin.

the thing is, Abraham wants his opponents to come to him and throw punches, so Pavlik will do exactly what Abraham wants. This could spell trouble.

Imo it´s a 50/50 type fight. Either Pavlik on points or Abraham by KO but I lean more to AA because Pavlick´s chin and defence isn´t good enough.

 

The only fighter who is better than anybody on Abraham´s resume is Taylor and if Abraham would have been American he would have fought Taylor and not Pavlik. That´s a no argument.

 

And it took AA 16...

And if you think Pavlik's style is clumsy and AA's isn't...well I dont know. Pavlik throws accurate, straight shots and AA lunges and throws loopers. which is more clumsy?

 

Yeah Abraham throws loopers. You should pay a little more attention when you watch fights - just look when he throws haymakers and when straight shots.

 

He is more athletci by a long shot. Pavlik is a slow clumsy fighter. In the first fight AA had his jaw broken and still won the fight even thought his jaw was hangn down. In the rematch he destroyed Miranda much faster than Pavlik did. Pavlik is so predictable it's not even funny. Plus Pavlik has been drop and hurt badly alreayd in his career. AA has never been hurt in a fight. Get in the ring and leanr something about boxing before you try to act like you know how fight.

 

Well i was a boxer for a year than started training in Wushu. Pavlik is Clumsy , Predictable, has bad defense, and punchs very slowly for a middleweight.

 

Wait--are you saying that Abraham doesn't throw wild shots?

Perhaps YOU should pay better attention...Any time he throws a power shot he's WAYYYYY open for a counter.

 

How accurate wer his shots when the vastly overrated Taylor droppen him? AA has never been hurt like that. Do you box.

 

he got the decision. big difference.

 

Whe a fighter is hurt as badly as Miranda was you can throw powerful looping punchs like AA did against Miranda. Tyson would drop and opponent then catch them with powerful loopn punchs. Tyson would lung in just like AA did when Tyson had an opponent hurt. Watch some more boxing or just get in the ring.

 

Yeah, cause he's never knocked anyone out before.....ridiculous.

 

How many Abraham fights have you actually seen ?

Defense ?

Definitely goes to AA.

Chin?

AA again

Really ?

The Pavlik/Abraham possible match-up wasn't even thought of in 06.

So you picked Abraham to stop Miranda BEFORE it actually happened ?





This fight could go either way.
If it lasts 12, I would slightly favour Kelly.

If there's a stoppage, Kelly gets assisted from the ring.

Prediction: AA by late KO/TKO

 

Pavlik's been hurt once in his career, and that was against Taylor, and only because Pavlik stuck out his chin and gave Taylor free shots. You say Abraham was never hurt, what's with the titanium jaw and 23 screws?? You don't have to bash the other fighter and anyone who thinks he will win to give your opinion.

 

Read what I wrote. Abraham throws haymakers when he either has his opponent hurt or when there is no big danger of getting countered. The rest of the time he throws nice straight punches, they may not be as spectacular but they are there.

 

Well, he wasn´t hurt when ho broke his jaw. Watch the fight.