The article I referenced in my original post is a real laugher written by someone who clearly does not know **** about boxing. http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/homesport/Froch-training/article-589501-detail/article.html I had no idea my thread, which was meant to give everyone a good laugh, would become a ****** magnet.
If this guy gets his way froch will have cleared out the division in a month Anyone see the writers name on the article?
Well, after Rubio the loss streak will be over. :deal So much for "two in a row". 5 million is a lot of money, even for Pavlik. It would double his biggest pay day. I wouldn't presume to know what he would do. And I don't think he would expect to lose to a much smaller man.
Well, I think that you have to earn the right to have a 'by line'. That would explain a lot. I'm almost tempted to register so I can post a link to this thread in the comments.
Stop ediing the question, I specifically asked EXACTLY AFTER THE HOPKINS LOSS, EXACTLY AFTER THE AM LOSS, would Cotto & Pavlik faced PW & PBF?
Seems like some people can't be bothered with the long version, so.... "But Pavlik is scheduled to defend against Marco Antonio Rubio in New York on February 21 before taking his pick from Arthur Abraham, Ricky Hatton and Floyd Mayweather jnr."
I get the feeling that this guys just another irresponsible reporter who reports rumors. I'll believe it when I see it.
Which has to do with what? And I am not "ediing the question". Here is the exact quote: We can't read you mind in terms of what you THINK you are saying, especially given you don't seem to be able to do that.:bart You obviously didn't read the article (or remember for two minutes what it said, doesn't matter much, same result). The article specifically states AFTER RUBIO. You seem to be the only one here having trouble with the context.