pick 'n impartial poster 2 decide mythical matchup winners

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Aug 21, 2010.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    275
    Oct 4, 2005
    Thanks, McGrain is a good shout.

    What about yourself?

    Some others (who may or may not be active in this forum anymore):
    The Kurgan
    My Dinner with Conteh
    My_2sense
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,926
    45,774
    Mar 21, 2007
    Would your judges be judging the debate or the match?

    teeto
    JohnThomas
    mattdonnellon

    If they could be bothered, would all be fine I bet. This is agreat way to make people furious though.
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    I was just thinking that

    Thanks for the recomendation
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,926
    45,774
    Mar 21, 2007
    Is your real name teeto? I would like it if it was.
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    Haha unfortunately no, it's my dog's name though (sure i've told you that before!). I think my dog's name would be spelled 'Tito' though.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,926
    45,774
    Mar 21, 2007
    Oh yeah, you did.
     
  7. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    ChrisPontius impartial? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    You must have never heard the "Duran was in his prime vs. Buchanan" tirade.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    Awwwww little Tito
     
  9. Duranium

    Duranium Member Full Member

    422
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    most of the posters suggested are self-proclaimed massive Duran fans, there will never be any neutrality on Duran hypotheticals atleast on here. Broken record, but its true.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good

    Just because someone is fond of/a fan of a fighter, it doesn't necessarily mean it affects that poster's objectivity.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,926
    45,774
    Mar 21, 2007

    :lol:

    Most certainly. Proven over years.
     
  12. Duranium

    Duranium Member Full Member

    422
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    Well tell me this, as a massive Duran fan yourself...who is more likely to suggest you as impartial, me or itrymariti and duranimal??
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    I'm a massive Duran fan but like i said, it doesn't affect my objectivity, this is proven and has a track record so dig up the posts if you have any qualms about that. To answer your qustion i don't know. Itrymariti is hardly a biased poster, he slates fighters from all eras. Just because he thinks highly of Duran doesn't mean much, Duran was a great fighter, as were others. Nobody has mentioned Duranimal in this thread
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    No ****ing ****.
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    "Duran was in his prime vs. Buchanan"

    "Duran was basically a natural MW vs. Hagler"