Please no Burns vs Liam Walsh

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Robert, Oct 1, 2012.


  1. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    Ricky doesn't need this right now.
    He should have a tune up with Broner first THEN go for Walsh.
     
  2. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    :rofl
     
  3. perspicacity

    perspicacity Raising The Bar Full Member

    4,901
    0
    Nov 25, 2010
    **** fight, it'll add a KO to Burns' highlight reel and hopefully help seal a big unification next year.

    Ricky Burns should be fighting a better level of opponent than Walsh :-(
     
  4. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Yep really surpassing Carl Froch with this one..
     
  5. perspicacity

    perspicacity Raising The Bar Full Member

    4,901
    0
    Nov 25, 2010
    How can you surpass someone you've already surpassed? :lol:
     
  6. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    :lol: True, just shows how stupid Frank is by making statements then showing the levels. This lad is nowhere near European level at the moment let alone world level..
     
  7. perspicacity

    perspicacity Raising The Bar Full Member

    4,901
    0
    Nov 25, 2010
    It's difficult to comprehend how Frank can attack Froch probably knowing full well he is about to make this announcement :rofl
     
  8. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    :lol: Exactly. BTW bro LP has challenged you lads over at the other place in the Nations Cup.
     
  9. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    did he really say that?
     
  10. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    On the Bunce hour, Burns said his team were looking at someone within the top 10 of the WBO.

    Hopefully it is Ji-Hoon Kim!
     
  11. Robert

    Robert Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,342
    0
    May 12, 2009
    Boom thought i would bring this back
     
  12. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    I haven't a problem with Burns fighting Walsh, it just shouldn't be for the title.
     
  13. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    :lol: Bloody hell Kos, you got your hopes up there.
     
  14. bam bam

    bam bam Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,589
    0
    Mar 30, 2010
    Walsh is currently 13th:-(
     
  15. Robert

    Robert Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,342
    0
    May 12, 2009
    In defence of this fight say it is Broner next in March/April if he did not have this fight it would mean Ricky had only boxed 4 rounds in the year prior to the Broner fight, the fight with walsh(ticket seller) is just to Keep him sharp and his wieght under control, remember its just an undercard fight just like when he fought CooK(on the undercard of Mitchell-Murray) prior to the Katsidis fight

    In defense of FW whats the point in just putting him in a 10 round non title fight to keep him sharp when you have someone like Walsh who is ranked in your stable so why not just make it a title fight get a bit more publicity allthough slightly devaluing the title

    it just like Bellew vs Cleverly to me