I like Wilder but he has less rounds than a rodeo clown in the ring for any HW time will tell very soon:deal :smoke
fury is almost as protected as wilder. it is doubtful he'd recover, if he ever faces someone who can punch.
almost is the key word there. joey abell isnt good but he could punch, Cunnigham cant punch but he has good boxing skills, chisora ko'd wilders best opponent malik scott, kevin johnson can be a pain in the ass, david haye pulled out twice. its puts things into perspective. Wilder is far more protected, wilders 31 fights compared to furys 23, and fury is younger.
i didnt deny that. i said fury has gotten up and fought well when dropped hard. So if you have to be so blunt, be so quicker, so i dont need to debate with ya. you plank
arreola hits harder than fury, doesnt mean he is more off a threat to stiverne or klitchko though. :bbb
neither are any threat. btw, hammer has only a fifty percent ko rate, less than chisoras. he failed to ko airich, who was ko'd before that fight by tye fields, and gbenga oloukon. hammer can't punch.
triangle theories mean **** all. povetkin couldnt ko huck at heavyweight, but cunningham tko'd huck at his natural weight class. now i guess steve hits harder than povetkin. im not saying hammer is a great fighter, but now your just trolling. I already proved furys resume is better with less fights, and this is a keep busy fight.
why are you discussing hammer vs fury here with me? I noticed you were having a debate with terryESB in the other thread about leif l****n or whatever. this thread was about wilders chin. no one knows how bad his chin is, but having a bad chin, doesnt mean you dont have good recupartive abilities like fury has shown, I merely commented that he may need to show and get off the canvas to be stiverne. :blurp