POLL: Wladimir Klitschko's resume....

ATTENTION ALL POSTERS ON THIS THREAD:

I think I have just figured something out. Regardless of the outcome of Widow's ridiculously one sided biased campaign with this poll, a clear observation can be made. The current numbers of the thread are around 53 in favor of Widow but only about 19 in favor of myself. Yet, the only people who have primarily posted in this thread are primarily in favor of my views, excluding one idiot named eze who so ignorantly accused me of only listing the current ages of Wlad's opponents and not the actual ones, when he fought them ( not true ).

Could it possibly be, that posters who are passing by are not reading the contents of the thread, or worse, are Widow's numbers constructed from random people, perhaps at school or on a college campus whom he's coaxing to log in and vote for him?

Personally, I think the level of posts on this thread supporting our arguments makes me a bit leary.

 

Funny how only 18 or so posters have contributed to this thread, with the majority leaning towards my side, a few who are nuetral, and only a small minority who favor Widow's views.

For those who took on the action of posting.

Actions speak louder than words.

 

Do you think Window could be using alias's (again) :think

 

No, Wlad's resume has not been formed by feasting on "shells of older fighters." The fact is that in this era, most of the top heavyweights just plain are old. I think the only heavyweight in the top 10 who's under 30 is Samuel Peter, although Povetkin may be top 10 now (but Wlad probably will fight and beat Povetkin), and Wlad already faced and defeated Peter. The guys he has been beating have not been "shells of fighters," but have been, for the most part, guys who were currently on top and near the peaks of their careers.

 

They are old and in the top 10 during Wlad's reign, because competition is so poor, that most of these 35+ guys couldn't make names for themselves in the 90's when comp was better. Some examples are Ray Mercer, Chris Byrd, Donell Nicholson, Frans Botha, and Corries Sanders ( who beat Wlad ). All of these guys were prospects during the 90's, and likely near their peaks, but could not ascend to the top of the divison, because better fighters stood in their way. As soon as the crowds cleared, these guys were all of a sudden viewed as world beaters, and were there for the pickings for Wlad.

 

Do you suppose Wlad preffered Kraft Velveta with those shells?

 

I also dont understand how you could say that Wlad fights old heavyweights when the prime age for a heavyweight is between 30-35. Wlad fought most guys in their prime or very close to it.

Many of you concidered Peter to be GREEN when he fought Wlad, so on one hand 34 year olds are too old and 26 year olds are too green, you just cant win with some of you.

 

Yeah, you need an aweful lot of processed cheese to make ordinary pasta taste good. :good

 

You could say that Wlad has built his legassy by beating old fighters if he had beaten James Toney, Oleg Maskaev and 2007 version of McCline. The reality is that Wlad has built his legassy by beating some young and some old fighters.

 

Good post