Povetkin V Peter

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cachibatches, Apr 4, 2008.

  1. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    To be honest I've only seen Povetkin vs. Chambers and some assorted highlights from youtube................
     
  2. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    18
    ams/pros are two pairs of shoes. vidoz is clearly below sam wife-beater in pro-terms and povetkins (back of the head) chin is still unproven.
     
  3. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    17,407
    Likes Received:
    8
    If Samuel comes into this fight in shape, I have no doubts in my mind that he would beat a tough oppenent in Povetkin, but thats a pretty big if, nowadays. His stamina issues and his overconfidence is starting to worry me a bit, I really thought the Mccline fight would be a wake up call for him, but that doesnt seem to be the case, if he comes in the same shape he did for Maskaev and Mccline, Povetkin has a pretty good chance of winning this one, if Peter shows up in the 245 or lower range, I see Peter getting him out of there in the 6th or 7th round.
     
  4. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    45,678
    Likes Received:
    4,208
    I would take Povetkin he has better skills etc. Peter is slow, has no skill and is a flat footed stationary target. Peter will not have his belt for long.
     
  5. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,017
    Likes Received:
    47
    Can you please stop bringing up the amateurs when discussing this matchup. It has no bearing on a potential fight between them in the pros.
     
  6. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,161
    Likes Received:
    3
    Povetkin is the real deal but I think Sammy might just win here. Unlike Chagaev, Povetkin will be there to be hit. And Sammy hits too hard for you to just stay inside on him like that. He might not land with the accuracy of a Waldo Klitschko, but he's very heavy handed. The more chance you give him of landing the worse it's going to be for you.

    Chagaev is really the only guy outside of an Eddie Chambers type who I could see beating Sam at this point. Chambers being someone who will make him miss and make him pay all night.
     
  7. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,161
    Likes Received:
    3
    You're a delusional freak. We've been over this before. Maskaev did NOT hurt Sam Peter. It was a balance shot that landed on the shoulder.
     
  8. FourtyOunce

    FourtyOunce Stick Ninja Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,881
    Likes Received:
    3

    What the hell does the amateurs got to with anything??? Hell Tua was Ko in the amatures... You crowing povektin a ATG cause he was great in the amateurs:rofl:rofl
     
  9. FourtyOunce

    FourtyOunce Stick Ninja Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,881
    Likes Received:
    3

    That is why I have boxing guru on my ignore list:good
     
  10. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,149
    Likes Received:
    1,045
    Povetkin makes Peter look bad in this matchup.

    Povetkin by UD.
     
  11. Cachibatches

    Cachibatches Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,261
    Likes Received:
    12
    I thank you for this post.

    I am glad someone poited out that Chambers is a class act, and the fact that Povetkin had a difficult first few rounds is no shame, flu or no flu.

    Chambers has a future at heavy or Cruiser.
     
  12. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    3

    Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding...

    We have a winner in the
    "Most Assinine post of the Year Award"!

    :rofl

    Ohhh yes... he looks AWFUL in knocking Maskaev the FUCC OUT inside of 7 rounds to become champion.

    Your post = Fodder for my feces.

    :hi:
     
  13. FourtyOunce

    FourtyOunce Stick Ninja Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,881
    Likes Received:
    3

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  14. Odo

    Odo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2004
    Messages:
    11,145
    Likes Received:
    169
    It does,brooklyn,it does!

    Dont get me wrong! I quite agree with you that pro boxing is a different pair of shoes,and that a loss at the amteurs against a certain fighter doesnt nesserarily mean that amateur loser A stands no chance against amateur winner B.
    However,fighters are human beings,too.Intimidation,reputation,name recognition,fame,and a successful amateur back ground influence a fighter's psychology,too.
    There are factors to be reckon with.Boxing is a mental game.
    Povetkin was a superstar at the amateurs.Sam Peter didnt dare to cross Povetkin's shadow at the amateurs.Povetkin was the superpower then.Sam Peter was a nodoby then.Who do you think that the edge in confidence when they meet in a pro ring? That tiny psychological advantage may not be the decisive factor in an encouter between Peter and Povetkin,but you cant rule it out.
    Thats why I tend to bring up the amateurs,brooklyn.
     
  15. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,017
    Likes Received:
    47
    So it's more of the psychological aspect, huh?

    Fair enough:good