Pretty Boy Floyd v Sweet Pea Whitaker

Point out where I've ever given anyone an advantage they didn't actually have in a matchup. Or, taken away an advantage (you know, something that you consistently do) from anyone.

Better yet, just show where I'm been irrationally bias towards Mayweather.

Otherwise drop the BS and prove me wrong.

 

:verysad

How dare you demean wet carrots like that.

 

There. You proved you don't understand **** about Pea, that you overrate the hell out of Floyd, underrate his opponents to increase his chances, and that you're a fool.

 

The same goes for Floyd then...so it's a flawed point as to why you think Mayweather would win

 

Julio Cesar Chavez and Azumah Nelson. That's if you're not counting his fight with De La Hoya, which most scored as a Whitaker win, and rightly so.

 

He beat Chavez, you obviously are a boxrec hunter who hasn't seen the fight, It's considered one of the worst robberies of all time. Nelson would most certainly not get KO'd by Floyd. In fact, at 130, I think that fight is 50/50. At 135, I might favor Floyd. You're showing your extreme lack of knowledge against with these ridiculous statements. He KO's Nelson but gets arguably beaten by Castillo?

Sweet Pea has faced 4 fighters on Floyd's level in Chavez, Nelson, Oscar, and Tito. He lost legitimately to one of them when he was shot. Otherwise, the majority opinion is that he won the other 3, even while past his best vs Oscar.

 

Now I think you're just trolling.

But if not, I'll flip it on you. I sure as hell can't see Pernell having trouble with Castillo when he schooled a fighter on a whole nother level than Castillo in Chavez. Castillo was Chavez's sparring partner for Christ's sake.

 

In their prime, Whitaker would have taken care of Void, too smart in the ring of Void.

 

You are proving constantly how much of a mental midget you are. Your knowledge of boxing is about as wide as my dog's knowledge of quantum physics.

Nelson would've given Floyd more trouble than Castillo would've likely.