yes ,because if he fought hamed in his prime (before he lost his amazing reflexes) he won't be able to do what he did.
You're not suggesting that Hamed was shot to pieces when he fought Barrera are you? Because this laughable.
Again, those guys only looked good because they were fighting trash. Tyson did not peak at 23! The challengers just became more worthy. Same with Naz.
some idiots can't admit the fact that naz only KO's hittable opponents second tier fighters, but when he decided to step up his game and fought an elite he can't figure out what to do, and then decided to quit boxing for good. quitter. JMM, on the other hand, never quits. JMM will figure out Naz like MAB if the fight had happened.
Since when did you get extra credit for knocking a guy out quicker? Did I miss a memo or something? So we've decided that punchers are superior to boxers now?
Someone get Naz some "slim fast" so they can settle this...in '09 (Hamed was brutal, But the finesse game would have done him in everytime IMO.) Wish he would have stuck around tho, after the Marco fight.
Naz is a power puncher and everybody knows that he will knock his opponent out early while jmm is a counter puncher/technician with a good power. Everyone knows that a power puncher will knock a non elite boxer earlier than a counter puncher. That explains why naz knock non elite boxer quicker than jmm but if we are talking about elite level boxer that is another story and we all know what happened to naz when he face an elite boxer in mab and guess what, jmm just beat mab. I really dont know what is the point of the thread starter. Maybe he is just a naz hugger or a totally delusional fan. Yes, naz ko his opponent earlier than jmm but jmm is a far better boxer/fighter than naz.
JMM is by far the superior boxer. Naz was a 'couldabeen/what if' fighter. Had an impressive showy start to his career, and always the punchers chance ...but guys like barrera, jmm, morales, pac have consistently proven themselves at another level.