prime pinklon thomas v michael dokes ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by daverobin, Oct 20, 2016.

  1. daverobin

    daverobin Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    2,403
    Likes Received:
    515
    who would you bet the house on ?
     
  2. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    12,714
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Dokes could box, and move, plus had power. Pinkie had that "shotgun" type jab. Going wih Dokes by close UD, due mostly to his ability to move if necessary.
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2016
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    66,690
    Likes Received:
    87,677
    Been done already. It's pretty close but the majority of the forum favoured Thomas.

    Dokes is better to watch though.
     
  4. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    12,714
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    As an amateur, the undersized Dokes fought Teo Stevenson close in several bouts televised on Wide World of Sports. Dokes didn't "quit" like some of the USA amateur team members did when the Cuban heavies began to dominate the Tournament bouts.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,232
    Likes Received:
    27,751
    I'm going with Pinklon by decision or stoppage.. I think his elite jab would neutralize some of Dokes handspeed and his powerful right could cause some damage. Both of their careers were derailed by lack of discipline and drug use. But I think Thomas shined a hair brighter when they were at their best. Dokes had some less than flattering performances against Cobb, Ocasio and Weaver in the rematch. Depending on judging and criteria he might have lost one or all three of those fights. strangely enough, I actually think the late 80's version of Dokes would have the best chance of beating Pinklon. He was motivated, well trained, under new management and drug free. He also discovered how to set down on his punches and utilize real power. On the evening Dokes battled life and death with Holyfield might have been the best rendition we ever saw of him.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  6. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    12,714
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Concur with Magoo's "essessment" of the Holyfield fight version of Dokes.^
     
  7. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    25,298
    Likes Received:
    19,851
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,716
    Likes Received:
    30,653
    N
    Neither ,its a pretty even match up imo Thomas' jab v Dokes' speed.Toss up fight.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,290
    Likes Received:
    49,723
    TBH i actually think the Weaver rematch was an excellent performance by Dokes. This may have been the best Weaver we ever saw. After losing via controversial circumstances in the first match he was extremely determined and still prime. Dokes went 15 with an extremely good heavy with excellent power. He really had to dig deep in this one. I thought Dokes lost by a point or two but believe it was inside the best two showings ever for both fighters.

    Dokes started sitting down on his punches a bit prior to Weaver. Unfortunately he was pretty drug ****ed not much after.

    It's between this version and the Weaver one. I'm still inclined to go the Weaver one. From the waist up he looked great against Holyfield but he was old man river below.

    The Holyfield fight did show just how much unrealised potential he had.