Rank these top brits

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by toffeejack, Oct 20, 2008.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Hatton has a better resume than Eubank and Hamed, surely?
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    You really think Hamed has that much boxing skill?

    I think he's got great physical gifts, speed, power and reflexes but he's not really skilled in any classical sense. You wouldn't teach a kid that style, because its not fundamentally correct, it relies on physical attributes more than anything.
     
  3. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Resume
    Lennox Lewis
    Nigel Benn
    Joe Calzaghe
    Ricky Hatton
    Chris Eubank
    Naseem Hamed
     
  4. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Why is Hatton's resume ranked above worst? Second to worst is excusable.

    He was one good win in all seriousness.
     
  5. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I suppose I was thinking early on in his title reign, when he could really put the punches together; reflexes combined with accuracy, a good workrate, speed and power of punch: P-4-P I would take him over any other on the list with the exception of Lewis.

    However, I get your point that there is a big talent element involved; but when you talk about boxing skills you have to include natural physical talent as well, because, as with Roy Jones, it affects how the fighters' style evolves.
     
  6. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Lets not get into the Tszue debate. :D

    Hatton has been the no1 man in that division for a time now. He unified as well - Two weight champ - Ring fighter of the year (not sure you can include that, but I did). I think there is a fair case for him to be above Hamed, and Eubank resume wise.

    Ricky Hatton 44-1 resume and achivements

    The Ring magazine's World Light Welterweight Champion June/2005 to present


    The Ring magazine's 2005 'Fighter of the Year'

    Unified belts at the weight

    Former 2x IBF World Light Welterweight Champion

    Former WBA World Light Welterweight Champion former

    Former WBA Welterweight Champion

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    Hatton's best wins at 140... 43 wins no losses

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    ,
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
     
  7. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I would have said that the Vince Phillips and Ben Tackie wins were better than beating Urango
     
  8. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I wasn't about to get into that old chestnut again. I'm giving him that as his one good win, I can't deny him that however he achieved it and whatever Tszyu was like. It looks like a good win.

    The last line is pretty telling. For all those "achievements", look at who he actually beat there. Maussa, Urango...who cares?
     
  9. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Urango still has potential, but I admit Hatton is perhaps missing a long list of real good names on his resume (However there are one or two others I could perhaps add to the list I made).
     
  10. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    He is, there is no depth outside Tszyu.

    I think you'd be suprised if you took another glance at Eubank's who you are putting him below.

    Michael Watson X2
    Nigel Benn draw and win in legendary fights
    Rocchigiani in Germany

    That isn't better than a win over Tszyu, and then shot as **** Castillo, Urango, Maussa...whoever else you want to put here? You can find Urango's, Tackie's, Maussa's on anybodys resume, they are just fillers. It's like putting Sakio Bika down as a fantastic win for Calzaghe. Although Bika is more proven.
     
  11. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    See theres two more TFFP.
     
  12. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Hatton's top 10 wins are as follows.....

    Tszyu
    Castillo
    Collazo
    Phillips
    Lazcano
    Tackie
    Maussa
    Urango
    Any two from..... Rios, Magee, Hutchinson, Rowsell, Krivalopov, Oliveira, Stewart

    People's issue with Hatton is that following his win over Vince Phillips, with the exception of the Tackie fight his career stagnated badly for 2 1/2 years until he fought Tszyu, whilst Witter was winning Lonsdale belts and Euro titles, Hatton was beating bums like Dennis Pedersen.

    There is a lot of B-/C+ fighters on there - only the top 6 could be considered B or better.
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    It's kinda strange to me if Urango, Maussa and Tackie are catipulting Hatton above Eubank. To me they aren't that good of a win, you are supposed to win those fights. If they are worth a mention Calzaghe's resume must have a depth of about 15 names on it, likewise with Hamed who has all sorts of solid but unspectacular names.

    He has Tszyu, Castillo (shot) and Collazo as his best wins IMO. Its funny to me how Hatton fans would continually deride Witter, but its apparent to me he would have been one of the top 3 wins for him.

    I take the two Benn fights, the two Watson fights and Rocchi over any 5 people can come up with for Hatton. To me its hardly even debateable, but I'd like to hear a convincing argument for Hatton in these circumstances.
     
  14. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    A lot of people thought Benn won the draw against Eubank.
     
  15. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    A lot of people thought Collazo beat Hatton, but we are going on what is down officially on paper as a resume.

    The Benn fights are legendary, a point here or there hardly makes a difference to the debate.