Reece Carter scored Dychko-Dykes 95-94 for Dykes, which made it a SD. He scored Billam-Smith vs Rozicki 69-63 for the British boxer. Is Reece Carter a fair judge, or does he favor British boxers?
Reece Carter often referees and judges undercard fights, with prospects against journeymen. Would the journeyman have a fair chance of winning with Carter as the sole judge?
I thought Billam-Smith was dominating that fight throughout, is that not the consensus on here? Rozicki might’ve picked up a round, two at most, but I see nothing wrong with that card. Not seen the Dychko fight yet.
I was passively watching the fights so I don't have a counter scorecard but I felt Dychko was winning every round though he looked like **** doing it. I thought Rozicki was pretty competitive but Smith was landing the better work more consistently. I felt if anything the ref was bad and not warning Smith for all the holding he was doing in the early rounds. If Smith got warned a fresher Rozicki may have had more success if he was able to fight in close