**Rematch:Dec 3rd, NYC, Cotto Vs Margarito Countdown....Poll Added**

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by LP_1985, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
  2. roe

    roe Guest

    This is one of those fights where my pick is different every time I think about it.

    Part of me sees Cotto outboxing him again, this time landing in flurries even more frequently to early on in the first fight where he also busts Margarito's right eye up pretty badly. The fight could get stopped at any time due to this.

    Then I can also see it being very possible that Margarito again comes on in the 2nd half of the fight, wearing Cotto down and landing the same uppercuts that did the damage before, this time on an older, more worn Miguel Cotto.

    And then I can see Cotto managing to brave that and ride out for a close and debated decision which he'd likely win being the home and favoured fighter.

    I really cannot call this. I voted Margarito to win but I've already changed my mind back to Cotto by close decision :s
     
  3. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Is it bad I want Margo to beat him?
     
  4. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    :lol:
     
  5. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Why would it be bad?
     
  6. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    1) he is a cheat
    2) he could have killed someone
    3) he seems a complete *****

    But I want him to win by KO :lol:
     
  7. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    Quality Avater:yep:yep
     
  8. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Yes, it really is. The guy's a grade A ****.
     
  9. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    A battle of good vs evil.

    I hope this time the good guy wins!

    I can't understand anyone wanting Margo to win TBH, He could of damaged the sports rep by killing a fighter..
     
  10. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    1. He was caught in the Mosely fight, there's no evidence whatsoever that he had loaded wraps in any other fight. He was suspended & served his time. I dont in anyway condone what his trainer did but the authorities have dealt with the matter imo.

    2. He still might, its a dangerous sport. Is he any worse than guys who have been caught taking PEDs? ie Mosley

    3. Antonio a G.

    Nothing wrong with rooting for the bad guy :D When you watch scarface do you tut-tut at Tony Montana being a naughty boy?
     
  11. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    I thought u might say that :lol:

    I really want Margo to stop him late because it will prove to me he didn't cheat in their first fight (something I desperately want to believe). I would love for Cotto to come out afterwards and, win or lose, say Margarito's punches were just as hard second time around
     
  12. Benoit on Roids

    Benoit on Roids Active Member Full Member

    1,088
    0
    Feb 20, 2011

    The villainous Tony Marg:happy:happy
     
  13. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010


    Like I said I want Margo to win, so you're preaching to the choir :lol:

    True he never got convicted of anything else, but it seems strange how he waits until he is a 1/4 favourite to load his gloves rather than use them in his other big fights

    And, he is a G!
     
  14. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    That's one thing he definitely won't say!
     
  15. Benoit on Roids

    Benoit on Roids Active Member Full Member

    1,088
    0
    Feb 20, 2011
    He is indeed:happy


    This content is protected