Remember when Paul Smith said this?

i like smith, think he is a decent fighter just hasn't got the power at super middle

 

:deal

 

Smith v Quigley should've been a middleweight fight.

 

He probably had people like you in mind livra.
When I type livra into my iPhone it gives an alternative of Lycra. Nice.

 

Won the British & Commonwealth titles in tough fights. He will show his quality.

 

Why the **** has PK not topped himself.

What a self indulgent complete ****ing moron you really are.

And lirva, whlst I cant stand Smith and think what he said was bull****, you are a wanker. A grade A, first class one at that!

Someone quote this please

 

In a way I kinda see Smith's point, but then again there's repeated instances of him saying ''you've never boxed, so what do you know'' or similar.

Realistically it doesn't take a lot of effort/brain power when reading a forum to know who knows what they are on about and who is either a numpty or just trolling away on their lunch break.

In a way I kinda welcome some of his honesty, he's never been concerned about picking a winner in a fight - such as DeGale vs Dilks - as opposed to doing what many do and sit on the fence for fear of reprisal.

Like when Arnie was asked if Bellew would beat Cleverly - he said ''no'', Bomber threw a hissy fit on here and Twitter, despite all the formlines pointing toward a Cleverly win before the fight.

Lirva is a strange case, probably the most hypocritical voice I've ever heard/read, according to his agenda at that particular time.

 

:good

 

I'll be rooting for Groves because Smith had a chance to make ESB his home but he didn't Also, want to see Groves vs DeGale II.

 

Just got 4/1 on a smith win think he can win groves style will suit smith

 

:rofl

 

Paul Smith is a wanker no doubt about it. Decent fighter though.