Marquez out landed Pac in their second fight per Compubox. He also out landed him in their first fight. So by your standards JMM should have won. Now judging a fight by how how much a fighter's face is marked up is just stupid. Pac did not clearly win anything. He was supposed to annihilate JMM and instead he was schooled by a better boxer.
That's the reason no one can dispute how close the fight is. All the Pacquiao haters/Marquez/Floyd lovers scored the close rounds to Marquez and the Pacquiao fans/Floyd/Marquez haters scored the close rounds for Pacquiao. Don't matter how many rounds you give Marquez he didn't win 6 CLEAR rounds and neither did Pacquiao.
Are you the credibility police or something? Don't you rate some of De La Hoya's losses higher than some of Pac's biggest wins?
We're talking about the III. Not II fight. Pls try and stick to the topic and not muddy the water. PAC countered a counter boxer all night. Marqueer was eating right hands all night long. It was a boxing master class.
LOL am I the only person who first saw the title as "Rewatched Pac/Marg fight" - as in Margarito? I was going to say, "You just NOW came to the conclusion that Pac won that fight?"
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8q7Oxkn5yM[/ame] From the 5 min mark on the video and on, the host explains eloquently the scoring criteria for scoring a fight and explains why Marquez clearly did better than Pacquiao in those criteria.
LOL, yes indeed How about digitally removing all the punches landed on Pac by Marquez, only then Pac could have won.. Naah removing the punches landed is like censoring the whole fight