Rewatching Canelo vs Golovkin 1 rbr

In other news, the Nevada State Athletic Commission , after reviewing post-fight pictures and video of the Fury- Wallin fight, have overturned the original decision and awarded the victory to Wallin.

This content is protected

According to the Commission...
" In all fairness, clearly the original judges failed to consider the state of Fury's face. Clearly, given the pictures presented by the Wallin team, we have no choice but to reverse the travesty of a verdict the judges originally rendered."

 

Wow what a casual non informed type post...but its worse because a casual you are not , so the only conclusion one can draw is that you set out to deceive....

 

You couldn't hold Shadow's handbags with the poor arguments you're bringing to the table. What has that got to do with how fights are scored?

 

I think he does ...you know , hold Shadows "handbag"....

 

Both of them.

 

Only a small percentage think Canelo deserves the draw. It will stay that way.
You are one of the small percentage. GGG may beat Canelo a third time before the year is up. Even at 40.

 

It has to do with how much damage was inflicted, who took more punishment. You said I deny what is clear to see. Well from that photo, it is clear to see that GGG was more marked up, which is consistent with Canelo landing the heavier and more damaging blows.

See the following comment :

As you can see, cuchy was claiming it was "obvious" that GGG did more damage and suffered less damage. Yet the post fight photo show the complete opposite. GGG was marked up badly in the face showing lots of bruising and redness while Canelo didn't have a mark on his face.

From that photo, it's "obvious" that GGG wore the wounds of war, while Canelo's face was clean. That shows us that GGG suffered more damage, was more bruised and battered, which is consistent with my clear and accurate view of what happened, and inconsistent with the idea that GGG caused more damage.

 

https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...s-golovkin-1-rbr.685129/page-10#post-21664799

 

A bad gash like that is different than bruising. Bruising and redness throughout the face is a direct result of high impact punching, a bad cut isn't necessarily a result of high impact punching.

 

As before, the point of the retort goes flying over your head, Shadow.



Anyway, You've been given a number of 'safe' off-ramps here, but you're still on the motorway.

For the last time, you 'saw' things in the fight that most didn't and you judged accordingly.

As did I.

Now...

Slán Leat
Au Revoir
Auf Wiedersehen
Arrivederci
Good Bye
Sayonara
Dasvidaniya

 

I saw what happened and judged accordingly. You ignored some of what happened, a.k.a. the finer details, and only focused on the basic aspects of what happened, a.k.a. who threw more punches, who connected more, who was moving forward, who was backing up.

Pro judges are trained to study and observe not just the basics but also the finer details. Mainly, punch impact and clean effective punching, also body punching, which you like many GGG fans don't focus on because Canelo was better at that than GGG was.

 

Jesus man, you have a reading difficulty as well as a perception problem...



Last time.

Slán Leat
Au Revoir
Auf Wiedersehen
Arrivederci
Good Bye
Sayonara
Dasvidaniya

 

This content is protected

 

Golovkin got his face and internal organs rearranged.

Even Abel Sanchez said Canelo deserved the win.

 

Fights are scored using the 10 point must scoring system.

Defense
Clean punching
Effective Aggression
Ring Generalship

Based on stats Canelo won defense.
Based on eye test Canelo landed the cleaner punches.
Based on eye test Canelo's Aggression was more effective.
And Canelo dictated the tempo of the fight in 11 of 12 rounds. Even when he went defense it was his choice but I'll give it to Golovkin since he was a bit more effective in that round.