Ring Magazine Subscription Cancellation

Dont order it myself but alright... The rankings are disgusting (GBP owns them...). I'll get news online without it and the only opinion I really care about is my own and the knowledgable boxing fans and writers I know,

 

Mares is GBP and a Mexican-American who was at #10 p4p last week until Giampa took over the ratings and ****ed it all up. Viloria isn't top 10 p4p, Froch is borderline. Giampas an idiot though, how do you skip someone to #5 and put a clown like Guererro in at 10 when the 2 guys you kick out of the top 10 haven't even lost and the recent wins by Guererro and Broner happened weeks before this. If they were gonna be put in there shouldn't it have been the week after their wins? Marinating a few weeks on their victories doesn't suddenly make them better hahaha also has anyone ever debuted at #5 int he rankings? hahaha ****ing hell its hilarious

 

Mares is 100% mexican, born in the state of Jalisco, just like Canelo

He's just lived a lot of years in U.S, he doesn't have dual nationality

 

I've cancelled my subscription, my fav fighter Audrey Harrison is not in the top 67000 p4p...****in disgrace,

 

Priceless! A Broner avatar and doesn't accept the fact that Broner should be that high. :good Atleast you are not a blind fan. Broner and Guerrero don't belong there, simple. GBP should just change it to GBP's P4P top 10! Mares, Froch should be on the list as previously stated. **** GBP, they are the new TR in the making. I'm surprised Canelo is not on that list since GBP wants to hype him up so bad.

 

Damned straight:good

Broner might be #9, but I could put both Froch and Alvarez ahead of him. Hell, Austin Trout is creeping.

Broner is probably top 10 to most, but 5 is a stretch.

 

I'll bet Nat Fleischer is turning in his grave seeing what Oscar & his Brass Boy Promotions have done to the Bible of Boxing

 

Ending the subscription over 1 ranking? Obviously theres more wrong

i've never subscribed, ive thought about it but never did

my brother had the magazine a yr or 2 before Oscar bought it

he said right away it didnt change much and that Oscar hadnt corrupted it but he said slowly but surely it drifted away from its quality, he unsubscribed within the last yr

he said he thought it turned into more of a kids mag stupid segments added, more big and bigger pictures and less actual writing

what has changed most about the mag? the format? the writers? the quality? is there much of a bias?

 

Yes, ring magazine is not what it used to be. internet thing killed it.