My card scoring it live was identical to Lederman in the rounds that I gave with the exception of the 11th which I gave to Pac (just). I'll rematch the fight, there definitely were some close rounds.
What is it with people on this site that do not understand that The Ring mag is based on opinion. Just because it calls itself the bible, doesnt mean it is always right. I have questioned the ratings on here before, but several on here are seem completely fooled and seem to think its P4P ratings are more than an OPINION. I wonder how many will use this scorecard in debates, as if it means more than the opinion of anyone elses other than the official scorecards
I thought last nights fight was a great, entertaining encounter. I had it 8-3 with one even. This Ring breakdown is absolutely garbage though. Regardless of which fighter you prefer (I like them both incidentally), there is no way that you could give so many consecutive rounds to Bradley as Ring online did here. I have been reading the Ring for a while, even now as it gradually becomes more and more unrealistic - but this fight card shows that they really aren't in touch with what is going on....OR that they are viewing things through biased eyes (as may have suspected before)
1,4,5 and 11 Bradley rounds. 2,3,6,7,9,10 and 12 Pacquiao rounds. Round 8 neither fighter really done enough to make it a clear round either way, I feel round 8 could be given to either fighter or be an even round.
While I do think pac slightly won, I wouldnt call it such a crazy score as most probably would. I could see how someone could score it that way to be honest.
no you didn't, I remember you did the same thing after the first fight, then after arguing round by round you admitted to me you were trolling because the Pac fans were trolling you... In what world can you give this fight a draw
MANNY PACQUIAO - WBO 147 CHAMPION. Poor Marquez, couldn't get that 5th division belt from Bradley. Alvarado can upset the 41 YEARS OLD Marquez :deal