RJJ vs Nunn

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nipple, May 17, 2012.

  1. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    5,332
    Likes Received:
    5
    @ MW, Both in their primes... Who wins/why/how?
     
  2. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    33
    Jones, SD
     
  3. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    9,548
    Likes Received:
    20
    Nunn. He was nearly as fast, much slicker, much rangier, much busier and never off-balance.
     
  4. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,050
    Likes Received:
    5
    :think...............:conf.
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    Hard fight to figure. I have to go with the guy who proved more in his career. Roy. Roy by SD like someone else said.
     
  6. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    13,965
    Likes Received:
    68
    Nunn . Just as much as left handed as Tarver , at least as tall and quicker than Tarver . Nunn would have outpointed James Toney if he wasn't as drained as he was against him . Nunn outgrew 160 but didn't move up in weight in time . If he had , it was possible that he'd have remained unstopped 2 this day .
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,088
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    Roy Jones by mid round knockout
     
  8. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    22,003
    Likes Received:
    35,331
    The Nunn that fought Frank Tate would be very tough for Roy Jones to deal with, but I suspect Jones would find a way to win. He could edge Nunn by a point or 2.