Roach "Bring on GGG! Who the hell has he beat? He is nothing special!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Chicano, Aug 28, 2015.


  1. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. alexgtshp

    alexgtshp Active Member Full Member

    772
    4
    Jul 21, 2011
    You sir think before you post. Always a pleasure reading your posts. Many here could learn from you, thank you.
     
  3. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Both GGG and Lemieux would KO either Cotto or Canelo easy.
     
  4. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011


    :good:deal
     
  5. Swollen Liver

    Swollen Liver Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,737
    237
    Oct 3, 2010
  6. Beatdaddy

    Beatdaddy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,363
    4
    Nov 3, 2013

    I don't know what odds that mistaken fellow would give, but I'd probably say Golovkin would be set somewhere between -400 and -600 vs Canelo and somewhere between -550 and -750 vs Cotto. Keep in mind that odds are set based not solely on who the casino thinks will win but also on the quantity of bets the casino think each participant will receive and the exposure that creates. The more people who bet on a participant, especially an underdog with a chance to win, the more exposure a casino has on that side of the line. That's why lines can move between open and close. If a ton of money is coming in on one side, casinos may move the line to soften exposure. That's why they say the smart money comes in early and late (i.e. before the casino moves the line and at the end of the casino moving the line--which is near the event). For example, the best odds were gotten on Pacquiao early and the best odds were gotten on Mayweather late because the line move a bit to soften the Pacquiao side because so many [dumb people] were betting on Pacquiao in the beginning.