Roach: Pacquiao close to a complete fighter!

This is who Floyd was fighting at 20 years old.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=4761&cat=boxer

At 18, the age where Pac lost his first fight, Floyd was an amateur.

 

No he isn't. Have him develop some semblance of workrate, then we'll talk.

There's NO such thing as a complete fighter. Nobody's perfect, mate.

 

I said 1999 or 2000. Floyd was WBC 130lb champ at the time, and he was like 22 or 23

 

roach wont stop talking ****. that's his job. he needs to sell the fight and act like it is a really close fight. people who repost roach's **** in this site are ten times more stupid.

 

Pac was WBC and Linear Flyweight champ at 19

at 22-23, he was already Super Bantamweight champ, 3 divisions up.

 

I know, and thats very impressive. But what you & I were debating was where Floyd was in his career at the time PacMan was when he was getting KO'd in 99. Just admit Im right and lets move on

 

He doesnt have workrate? Does workrate make you a complete fighter?

 

i think you may have reading comprehension problems, as I was clearly reffering to the fighters' ages, not the date.

Maybe you should go over my post again... that might help you out

 

Ofcourse it does. That's why the word COMPLETE is there. You have to be very good at EVERYTHING.

Are you serious?

 

a complete fighter means you have it all, no exceptions

and with that said....complete fighters do exist, they're all plent of em' Nonito Donair, Cotto, JMM etc.

all time...SRR

 

No, we were talking about Mayweather was when Pac got KO'd. Mayweather was 22 or 23 and the WBC champ at 130 in 99 or 2000 when Pac got KO'd by that Singsurat kid. But the real problem is that you thought I was referring to the first time Pac got KO'd but I was referring to the 2nd time. No reading comprehension there. But then you tried to cover it up by saying Pac was WBC & Linear champ at 19

 

Exactly, theres complete fighters out there. Tell that to that ***** up there

 

lol just read the post again. its not that complicated.

get it now?

 

did you know that he got KO'd twice?

 

i referred to both knockouts

"Mayweather was still an amateur" -> 1st knockout

"or fighting guys with an 1-13-1 record" -> 2nd knockout

get it?