My assessment doesn’t make an attempt to change his ranking though. It doesn’t attempt to elevate him above others any more than he already is. It is meant to define him through a modern analytical lens, and through modern criteria. Modern as in “Gassiev is not slow, and AJ is fast” modern. Just dusting off old cobwebs to make way for newer, fresher, better, more accurate, and more in depth interpretations. The old Bert Sugarisms are going to be increasingly uncomfortable to stick by as time progresses. People soon will start learning about Rocky more via digital content creators, and less through ESPN documentaries.
I'll do better. You first choose the thread. Cherry pick it so as to make at difficult as possible for me to find examples. If you decline that, I'll just go with the first google search result forum that pops up using the terms "Marciano+skills+competetion".
You actually didn't. You posted yours while I was typing mine. But in any case you're once again misunderstanding the burden of evidence, which you do frequently.
I'm going out to dinner. We'll see if you've specified a thread when I get back. My sole stipulation is that the main subject be Marciano and the level of his abilities and/or competition.
The thing is, when people talk "speed" in boxing it's usually relative to a fighter's opponents. Critical assessments of a boxer's speed usually come up: a) when he's being matched against someone much faster or; b) when he's being matched against someone much bigger. Gassiev is certainly slow, and I bet this will be more widely discussed whenever he stops cutting weight and takes on some of the bigger heavies.
I have not misunderstood any burden of evidence, here or elsewhere. You claimed that "it's also clear that anything short of cavalier dismissal of his abilities and his competition is absolutely guaranteed to be labeled by some as 'worship.'" I called BS and asked you to provide examples to support your claim. But if you're unwilling or unable to do so, that's fine by me. Since you've given me no reason to think otherwise, I'll just continue to hold my belief that your claim is a gross exaggeration.
So how does your first point relate to Rocky? As for your second point, I hope for Gassiev sake that you’re wrong, but for Rocky’s sake that you’re right.
It relates to Rocky because his subpar speed would be a major liability against some of the much bigger (and occasionally much faster) heavyweight champions that he gets matched up against in this forum. If we're speculating about how he would fare against Foreman (young or old), Tyson, or even Tony Tucker, etc., for example, he's slow enough that his speed would be a potentially significant liability, given his relatively diminutive stature and short arms.
I would have to disagree. I think the larger his opponent is, the faster he will appear. As fighters generally become slower with size. The liability turns into an advantage. Some food for thought: Rocky received criticism for speed in an era where he fought only 12 guys over 200lb, and I believe only two SHWs. Louis looks the fastest against SHWs and big sluggers like Baer. He looks slower against smaller opponents. As would anyone else.
Reznick, Im still waiting for you to actually refute what i posted, or are you going to continue ducking and answering questions with questions? I havent insulted you or did anything disrespectful. You started the thread and are playing defense, the least you can do is try to set the record straight and prove me wrong. Im not exactly alone or even unique in my assertations.
I did respond to your post. "I had no idea that a fighter with superb defense -gets dropped in the first round twice against two older, shopworn fighters -gets a black eye and stitches against a chubby washed up ex champion -barely scrapes by a decision while swinging for the fences and getting tagged all night against contender lastarza -gets his face disfigured and nose shredded open against a skinny shopworn light heavyweight." This is a poor argument. What do you want me to say? Ah, here, I got just the answer for you; Ali was known for better defense, and got hurt by worse opponents. There. Now it's your turn to say "But Ali was tall!" Do you think what we are doing here is productive? There are 100 different roads we can go from here that lead to 100+ tits, and 100+ tats. Are we going to go through each one, one by one, like some dumb donkeys? If you have a criticism on Rockys abilities, you should probably make sure that the same criticism doesn't apply to the Greatest of All Time. Check to see if your points survive some basic scrutiny. If I'm not addressing something you want me to address, please specify it.
Ali did not have superb defence ,he had superb reflexes. Ali was never dropped by a 38 years old fighter. Ali was never dropped by a 40 years old fighter. Ali had 61 fights, over a third of of them when past prime how many times was he marked up in those fights? How many times was he cut? Ali wasn't cut in6 fights. Ali was never in danger of being stopped by cuts. Why even mention him in a discussion about Marciano? You keep insisting Marciano had good defence though Louis said he had the style of a street brawler,, it must be a comfort to you.