Roy Jones Jr. .Vs. Ezzard Charles

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Aug 27, 2008.

  1. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,292
    Likes Received:
    56
    Who would win this match up at 175? Good clash of styles. Charles was at his best at LightHeavyweight. Jones still had alot of talent at 175 as well.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,815
    Likes Received:
    51,879
    I pick Jones to win this one. I think Roy could break up Ezzard's boxing and ryhym without compromising his own one bit. I think he could bank enough rounds.

    It's possible Charles could KO him, ofcourse. I do wish we'd learned more about that Jones chin during his peak.

    My pick - Jones WPTS.
     
  3. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    19
    Charles by KO. Good fight of course. Charles just so much more proven and skillful.
     
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    The thing here is, Charles' hands are so fast, he can hit Roy with combos definitely. i dont mean that that spells a KO loss for Jones, but it could. Anyhow, Jones could possibly do his usual thing and be elusive for Ezzard and possibly take it that way. But for me, Charles will be slick aswell, and maneuvre Jones into trade-offs throughout, at some poiint, it will pay off. Just my opinion.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,209
    Likes Received:
    27,705
    I'm going with Roy Jones.
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    57
    Just too immensely skillful you reckon? Might be right.
     
  7. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,641
    Likes Received:
    735
    I go with Charles he could do it all and proved himself against the best so we know he could handle elite opponents the same cannot be said about Roy at 175lbs. I think Charles would stop him late, in his fight with Marshall which is at light heavy he looks excellent and you can clearly see his speed and power are a lot better there then in his heavy days.
     
  8. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    86
    I havent seen enough of Charles but from what Ive heard, he should be too much for Roy at LHWT but thats not my official pick, I refuse to pick until I see more of charlie.
     
  9. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,028
    Likes Received:
    119
    I can't see Roy going 15 rounds with a fighter so complete and virtually flawless as prime Charles.

    His speed, precision, and overall superb technique would allow him to hit Roy flush, and by the middle rounds, I think he would be hitting him often, despite how fast RJJ was. Jones' chin was never truly tested in his prime, and since he has twice been flattened in quite brutal fashion by two fighters who never hit as hard as peak Charles.

    Charles stops him, either man could be ahead on points when the end comes, but the end comes no matter what.

    While he probably wouldn't chose to do so often, I think Charles is one of the few who could get the better of Jones on the outside.

    I just can't see Roy, who had unreal talent and was very intelligent in the ring but who had obvious flaws, beating a man like Charles who at his best was as close to flawless as anyone else. He's just too much.
     
  10. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    I go with Charles he proved himself against the best of the best while Jones never fought guys like Moore.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55,255
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    A hard one to call. How big is the ring? The bigger the better for Jones. How many rounds? The more the better for Chalres. Would Jones even risk this fight if he and Charles were both in their primes?

    I would pick Jones would win this fight, much the same way Leonard beat Hagler. Charles might do more damage, but Jones would score more often, and fights a smarter, but safer fight.

    Neither guy had the best chin, and both hit hard enough to take each other out.
     
  12. Mega Lamps

    Mega Lamps Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    6
    I would have to agree with this post.
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,776
    Likes Received:
    322
    Ezzard Charles was beating fierce ones like Archie Moore, Jimmy Bivins, Lloyd Marshall, Elmer Ray (who outweighed him by 20 pounds), and the clever Joey Maxim. In serious contrast with most of Jones' career, Ezzard was fighting former champions and formidable opposition early and never stopped let up fighting everyone from Burley at MW to Marciano at HW.

    Ezzard has too much experience, skill, and a willingness to take risks for Jones. Jones, with that speed and power, combined with the unorthodox Burley-esque style would make it interesting... but the big hint for me is how easily Ezzard dealt with Burley. That's the convincer.

    Ezzard wins as a MW or as a LHW. That post-war and Pre-Baroudi Cobra was a fighting machine. Here's a summary of why he beats Jones:

    * Ezzard could cope with bangers -as Elmer Ray and Lloyd Marshall and Archie Moore proved beyond doubt.

    * Ezzard can cope with unorthodox boxers known for speed and power. Burley was smaller than Jones but I'm not quite convinced that he hit any less hard at his best and I'm thoroughly convinced that Burley was better than Jones in terms of experience, quality of opposition, and heart.

    * Ezzard was known for speed, rythym, timing, and hard punching. He may not match the devestation of Jones in this regard, but he has superiority in every other category the honest analyst would care about.

    * Ezzard's level of skill far exceeded Jones. Ezzard schooled Archie Moore himself. Enough said.

    This content is protected
     
  14. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,843
    Likes Received:
    13
    I have to consider the guys Charles fought. Roy never faced as many talented fighters of that caliber in his career. I mean Johnson and Tarver KO'D Roy! what would one of, if not the top Lightheavy of all-time do? this is a guy who beat Archie Moore 3 times once by KO. He also beat Charley Burely and he supposed to lose to Jones. Boyhood heroes die hard and Jones' career coincided with many a posters boxing upbringing but its a visual mirage. The substance that was Charles has to win this.
     
  15. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    19
    I think this is an issue that effects everyone, no matter what age, no matter who the fighter...