Sam Langford vs James Jeffries 1910

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 29, 2012.

  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,088
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    Thoughts?
     
  2. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,501
    Likes Received:
    9,413
    Jeffries was nowhere near as fast as Dempsey,so Sam would be able to utilise his superior skills and pick 'Jeff' apart.
     
  3. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,315
    Likes Received:
    1,903
    Langford himself said he had no chance against Jeffries. I actually think this is a good style matchup for Jeff, for Langford was not the defensive wizard that Johnson was, plus he was only 5'7" and 170-180, didn't use a lot of footwork, and was willing to slug it out, which would be a dangerous proposition against a guy 6'1" 220-230 who had a good chin and heavy punch. It would be very entertaining though, regardless of result, because both were very tough cookies.
     
  4. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    311
    In 1910, more entertaining than Jeffries-Johnson, but I think Jeffries reactions were too shot for him to prevail at this point.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    72,007
    Likes Received:
    28,038
    I would be fairly confident of Langford taking the 1910 version of Jeffries.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    66,356
    Likes Received:
    53,919
    Langford performs a merciless beating that makes Johnson's treatment of Jeffries look like a tea party.
     
  7. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,464
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I actually think Jeffries is all wrong for Sam, in fact, Sam thought the same thing... That said, against the 1910 version.. I would give Sam the edge
     
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    10,091
    In 1910 Jeffries was a shell while Langford was in his prime .... I see Sam destroying him in under three rounds ... too fast and hard hitting ... Jeffries would be massacred ... prime for prime a different story ...
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    Shouldn't any fantasy fight be between both fighters in their respective primes ?
    If not where does it end ?
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,716
    Likes Received:
    30,657
    Correct me if I am wrong ,but it was Joe Woodman who said that ,and it was around 1906. In 1910 Langford would have beat the **** out of the faded Jeffries.
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    34,250
    Likes Received:
    5,943
    Jeffries has an edge over Sam at their peaks, but I gotta go with the 1910 Langford being too sharp for a 1910 Jeffries.
     
  12. Cmoyle

    Cmoyle Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    14
    "Correct me if I am wrong ,but it was Joe Woodman who said that ,and it was around 1906. In 1910 Langford would have beat the **** out of the f
    aded Jeffries. "

    Actually, there was a time that Langford supposedly said that he'd fight anyone except that big hairy fella (Jeffries). I can believe that he may have said that because according to Australian promoter Hugh McIntosh, there was a time that Sam thought McVey might have been too big for him. Of course, he went on to become McVey's master.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,716
    Likes Received:
    30,657
    I will happily defer to your greater knowledge on the subject.
    However ,it is my understanding that that comment was made around 1905,when Jeffries retired , at that time I believe Langford scaled around 156lbs?,
    By 1910 Sam would have beat the snot out of the seriously diminished Grizzly Bear.
     
  14. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,315
    Likes Received:
    1,903
    Actually, before the 1910 Johnson-Jeffries fight, Langford picked Jeff to win. Sam said he thought he could beat Johnson, but would have no chance with Jeff, which therefore explained his selection of Jeff to beat Johnson.
     
  15. Ringrat

    Ringrat Amateur Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    5
    In 1910, the 6' tall Jefries weighed around 220 on a good day and had the flesh hanging off him. If Johnson hadn't stopped him, he would've collapsed from heat-stroke.

    Sam fought guys who were just as big as Jeffries and in way better shape than the 1910 version. He would've moided Jeff in five or six rounds. In fact, Tommy Burns and Philadelphia Jack O'Brien would've made that model look like the tired old man he was.

    ...