Sam langford vs joe Louis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rothschild, Jun 3, 2016.


  1. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Nobody is that old you would have had to have been 20 or so in 1910 to see prime langford
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    But you assume that we all saw Louis?
     
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,257
    23,948
    Jul 21, 2012
    Langford is one of the greatest ever , but only for what he did in his own time. His greatness wouldn't carry over to later era's.

    He'd have next to no chance against Louis.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    You have to favor Louis based on his superior size and his own exceptional skills but I would never bet this fight ... Sam had the power to change it with one shot ..
     
  5. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Rubbish post

    The langford of the filmed Jeanette fight defeats any version of Louis

    You know nothing of the sport
     
  6. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    In my opinion once Sam lands flush this fight is over
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,257
    23,948
    Jul 21, 2012
    No ,he was too open and had too many holes to exploit. He fought more in line with the broughton rules than the sweet science. He approached his opponent with his hands down low , as was the way back then.

    Louis blows a hole right through him. Too crisp , sharp and accurate.
     
  8. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Langford deployed a high guard but would occasionally drop his hands to draw a lead and set traps but I wouldn't expect you to realise this as you don't know much about boxing obviously

    Louis' dodgy chin = langford by ko
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,257
    23,948
    Jul 21, 2012
    No, the high guard didn't exist back then.

    He and other would employ catchers mitt parrying technique . That worked against tug boaters , carnies , hobo's , textile merchants etc .. but it would be completely ineffective walking into a savage puncher like Louis who would pounce on Langford before he ever got into range and spark him clean out.

    These guys used just grind away at each other till the other could take no more. Langford never seen nothin like Louis in the ring.
     
  10. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    The high guard has existed since the birth of boxing

    You sir are a first class idiot

    You know zero about this great sport or langford you're what the kids these days call a troll

    Langford destroyed 220 pound men on a regular basis Joe Louis is a walk in the park for Sam
     
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,257
    23,948
    Jul 21, 2012
    If thats the deciding factor then Louis wins since he destroyed 250 pound men.
     
  12. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    The 250 pound men he faced were useless slow bums who do not compare to the modern super heavies

    And you ducked all my other points
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I bet Langford would look absolutely terrifying in his prime on some good quality film.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    But the 220lbs men that Langford beat were all top class?

    Please name some of these 220lbs men that Langford regularly ko'd?
    The only one I can find is novice George Godfrey.:think
     
  15. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Did mcvey ever beat langford ???