I read what you said, which is why I know that you aren't really scoring fights. You don't score, you watch in slow motion and play compubox. That's not how a fight is scored. Let me know when you've watched the rounds again, in real time, without your biased goggles on.
Injury aside, he still had enough in him to throw a lot through rounds 7 to 12. Which raises a huge question mark over his level of inactivity through rounds 1-6. If it was a really bad shoulder injury, he should've been gun shy all through. It wasn't a 100% fit Lomachenko for sure, but I think he lost the fight unable to make the necessary adjustments to Teo in time. Had he been more active through the first 6 rounds, he might've won the fight injury or not.
His adjustment was to take advantage of an inexperienced, fatiguing opponent and capatilize on the fact that Loma himself hadn't expended any energy in the first half of the fight. Teo nutted up in that 12th round though, threw caution to the wind, and battered Loma to the tune of 50 punches landed. Loma had no answers in the beginning, nor in the end.
Are you even reading what I’m saying? I’ve watched them real time as you’ve requested. You have a very weak argument to stand on. In fact, at this point I think you’re just trying to deny and ignore because you have nothing to stand on and are aware of this
So you've watched round 2 and 6 in real time. You've said you can see round 2 being scored to either man, so we don't have to debate that. But you said round 6 you think is a clear Lomachenko round. I see round 12 as being able to be scores to either man, but you think that's a clear Teo round. It's a subjective sport, people will disagree on the scoring of rounds, it's fine. It happens. I can see a weak argument for Loma winning, I can see a stronger argument for a draw, but ultimately I think the decision was the right one.
See how you have no comeback when actually debating scoring a round as opposed to playing compubox. You've been exposed as a troll here.
You haven’t produced any argument- I’ve countered all your points and you just regurgitate the same old irrelevant shite.
You haven't countered a single thing. You agree with me on round 2 being scored for either man. You weren't as accepting that round 12 could be scored for Loma as I was. But you don't want to debate that as your biased. You're only disagreement in the whole fight is round 6 you think it's clear for Loma, I think it could be scored to either man. That's it. So you haven't rebutted a single thing.
Since round 6 is the only round you've pretended to argue, although all you've actually said is you think it's a clear Loma round without any reason. I just watched it again, Loma is far too inactive to take this round. He barely throws a punch in the first 90 seconds. Then he looks like he's coming into the round for the next 30 but then spends the last minute again barely throwing a punch. Loma's activity levels are too low to justify any kind of debate about it. Does Loma throw with more accuracy than Teo this round? Probably yes, but does he outland him, not imo. Punches landed are in single digits this round, and it could go either way as I've already stated. However with his negative Loma was this round I personally wouldn't give it to him, I'd give it to the person making the fight. Happy with my scoring of this one.
Firstly, I’ve comprehensively scored round 6 previously so you’ve started talking to nonsense. I’ve just scored it live real time and I’m actually extremely shocked by your description of the round, I genuinely believe you have a visual impairment Lopez lands , and I’m not exaggerating here, 0 punches until the last 10 seconds. I challenge you to give me 2 timestamps of Lopez actually landing up until that point. If you can’t you may as well concede. At the same time Loma lands throughout this round up until that point with visible clear punches landed. I’ve counted these : >3 jabs (I’m not counting those tippy tap jabs, which I’m sure you’ll try to disingenuously counter with) >Right hook >Straight left but power of a jab >Strong jab >Jab counter I can timestamp these if you really don’t believe me. These are clear punches that aren’t debatable, because they clearly land via clear Lopez head moving back and sound. Lopez only lands in the last seconds of the round..one an uppercut to the chest , and right hand that grazes his chin (both confirmed in replays too) The fact you confidently claim you’re the one without bias here despite completely getting this wrong is hilarious to me. Youre someone I suspect there is no point debating because you’ll deny it regardless You’re again claiming Loma is being the inactive one wtf..he is the one who actually lands punches the entire round whereas Lopez is hitting elbows and gloves. You seriously shouldn’t bother scoring real time
Arm punches and body punches count. Glancing blows still set a pace Loma didn't outland Lopez in round 6. Too inactive
No you don't believe that, it's a poor attempt at humour. I won't give you any timestamps, I've told you we aren't scoring this in slow mo, we scored rounds in real time. You don't need to timestamp, I've told you we aren't scoring this in slow mo, we scored rounds in real time. Yes you have got it wrong, and you are biased, but that's fine, you aren't the first biased poster trying to score a fight for his hero, you won't be the last. Yes Loma is very inactive in this round, that's clear to anyone. You have to bother scoring in real time, it's literally the only way to score the fight. 21 people think Loma beat Lopez, out of 119. You can't even argue the other 98 people are biased since most of those believe Loma has won atleast one of the fights he didn't officially win. No time stamps necessary, now slo mo necessary, it's a close round but ultimately Loma was too inactive and negative to win it on my card.
He comprehensible did as I’ve just demonstrated in my post. Please feel free to explain what Lopez lands in the first 2 minutes 45