Shane vs Hatton?

Hatton is vulnerable to hooks, much more so than straight shots.

 

That's open to debate, but those are fights that I COULD see him winning.

I would favour him against Berto, 50-50 against Quintana and Collazo (based upon stylistic nightmares), a very live dog against Cotto (at 147) - and I haven't seen enough of Cintron to make an informed judgement.

 

Pretty mucho. Although to give Ricky credit, he seemed to do a better job avoiding Paulie's hooks minus a rare one or two that got through.

Then again I doubt Paulie could KO somebody in a pillow fight.

 

mosley vs mayweather

That is the fight I want to see, would still be a big pay-day for mosley and not a one-sided fight for the fans.

 

Mosley and Mayweather are far more accurate (not to mention powerful) than Paulie, bless him.

You could see him trying to set Hatton up for the check hook all night long, but made it so obvious.....

To give Hatton credit, he fought with much more intelligence in the Paulie fight than against Floyd, where he was boxing like a prat from the point deduction onwards.

I don't think Mosley would simply be able to land at will with the right cross against Hatton, as he did last night - it would be the hooks that would do the damage on the inside. Shane is good at blocking the bodyshots.....

Mosley stops Hatton on his feet, after about 8.

 

Hatton is too ***** to fight guys like Holt, Bradley, Torres, Witter, etc. No way in the world would he ever step into the ring with Mosley. Mosley would KO him within 3 rounds.

 

Awful post.

 

Mosley by murder.

 

He sure is too ***** to fight those guys, even though he fought the best fighter in the world in PBF! Got anything else smart to say?

 

mosley would win hatton's too small for ww

 

Too ***** to fight Holt or Torres, yet fights......

Mayweather
Tszyu
Collazo
Pacquiao
Castillo

FAIL.

 

It's a fact. He's ducked the best @ 140 for years and years. Proof is in the pudding. Carefully managed career to say the least. Why was his team considering the winner of Diaz-JMM if the Pacquiao bout didn't come off? Answer me that? Why couldn't he just fight the winner of the Holt-Bradley fight in England? Reason is he's scared of the threat of the other 140 lb. fighters so he wants to make it a bit easier on himself by fighting a smaller fighter. It's o.k., though, I'm used to delusional Hatton fans such as yourself. Keep celebrating crap wins like Lazcano, Urango, and Maussa...

 

No lose situation against PBF. If he lost, he lost to the P4P best. Got anything else smart to say? BTW, Hatton didn't land 10 clean punches in that entire fight. Congrats.

 

No lose situation against PBF. He fouled his way to a win over Tszyu. Collazo beat his ass and the evidence was on Ricky's face after the fight--it's also the reason Ricky went right back to 140; because Collazo beat his ass. Pacquiao is going to slaughter him. Castillo was a shell of his former self. Nice try though BB.

 

I'll tell you why becuase JMM is a bigger name than the rest of the 140 division put together at the minute. It's all about money you stinking ******.

If he was scared of 140 fighters he wouldn't have fought the best fighter in the world at 147lbs. Seriously, you know nothing.

Oh and Shane destroys hatton, bit of a ******ed thread.. Shane is a massive WW