Should Barrera have been DQ'd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jjbrams, Jul 25, 2013.


  1. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    DQ'd? You're watching too much drama kid.
     
  2. Benitom3

    Benitom3 Boxing Junkie banned

    9,446
    31
    Sep 16, 2012
    Since no one will fight GGG at 160, i see nobprob with him cleaning out 168 and 175. Could be done by next year. He smashes Ward, Froch, and Stephens amd makes top p4p by next years end.
     
  3. SUPER TROJAN

    SUPER TROJAN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,304
    47
    Jan 4, 2013
    That was a great moment in boxing. lol
     
  4. nutnfancy

    nutnfancy Guest

    Hamed seemed a bit of a ****; so, most people don't mind him getting a bit of a pimp slap to put him in line, which is all that this amounted to.

    That said. A point deduction would have been reasonable.
     
  5. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,136
    9,869
    Aug 1, 2012
    :lol:
     
  6. sbbigmike

    sbbigmike Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,847
    0
    Apr 15, 2010
    I wonder whats worst him banging Hamed into the turnbuckle on some WWE ish, or him walking across the ring and punching JMM after he knocked him down

    Barrera is a true G:lol:
     
  7. Kid Cincinnati

    Kid Cincinnati GOOD BOY NATION Full Member

    5,636
    7
    Sep 9, 2010
    It was legal. They had agreed before the fight to use the same rules they use in England.
     
  8. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    One of my all time favorite fights by one of my favorite fighters. I liked Hamed too though, but thought he was a bit c ocky.. I loved watching MAB put him in his place.
     
  9. 1_man_army

    1_man_army The Knockout King Full Member

    2,511
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    If Barrera gets DQ'ed for that than Naz should have been DQ'ed for pulling him down in a headlock earlier in the fight.

    Neither was a DQ though.
     
  10. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    Why you asking? It's ancient history now, been and gone. 'Less you're a boxer yourself and trying to establish how viable it is as a tactic.

    On the night, without any doubt Barrera dominated. The result reflected this -why would you want to see it overturned on what amounts to a technicality?

    Yeah, it was naughty, but how many headbutts and low blows you seen get by without even a warning. To my mind a DQ should result only from a foul that causes (or has a high likelihood of causing) serious injury or a foul that irrevocably alters the course of the fight (in the offenders favour).
     
  11. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    If it resulted in Naz being knocked out or a fight stopping cut, yes.

    If I was the ref I'd have taken 1, maybe 2 points for that move. Not that it would have made much difference to the scores in my eyes.
     
  12. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    point deduction
     
  13. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    Yeah DQ the fighter that clearly won every round... and in the final round gave the idiot what he deserved for fouling him.:good
     
  14. zicas

    zicas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,003
    457
    Aug 12, 2007
    Irrelevant.
    He would have whooped his ass again in the rematch anyway.
     
  15. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,101
    13,348
    Dec 2, 2012
    It would be like punishing a man for making his son go to his room.