Should Chris Byrd be in the HOF?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Martini643, May 17, 2008.

  1. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    10
    Its the Hall of Fame...not the Hall of Very Good.

    So no.
     
  2. El Matador

    El Matador Your Boxing Authority Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,538
    Likes Received:
    8
    Barry McGuigan is in there. After seeing him inducted, well, that broke the camel's back for me. Might as well induct Byrd.
     
  3. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,524
    Likes Received:
    34
    Nope, not even close. Just look at his resume and you will see why. Aside from beating a post-prime Holyfield, Byrd has never beaten a big name in his career. He has suffered losses to virtually all A-level fighters. Chris Byrd is not a legend, but merely a footnote in boxing's history.
     
  4. smoochp

    smoochp Da flyest1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    0
    No he should had been a lw years ago and would had probably been one of the greatest CW ever
     
  5. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,481
    Likes Received:
    96
    I would say no but then again I can't think of a heavywight since Lennox Lewis that should. Is Jimmy Young in the HOF?
     
  6. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    18,129
    Likes Received:
    34
    Not good enough.
     
  7. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,482
    Likes Received:
    2
  8. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,481
    Likes Received:
    96
    He is as good as many that are in it. He just came around in the wrong era. The era of the Super Heavy is not a good era for a small HW.
     
  9. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,482
    Likes Received:
    2
    :lol: C'mon, Flatlander. You could place Byrd in a time machine and plant him as far back as the 50's (Marciano's era) and Byrd still loses to TOP LEVEL heavyweights. ;)
     
  10. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,481
    Likes Received:
    96
    You have a right to your opinion. However, Byrd has been discribed as one of the most skilled and slick fighters in HW history. He could have frustrated the best of them.
     
  11. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,903
    Likes Received:
    1
    no. he held belts in a weak era. if he gets in, than arguably any belt holder ought to get in.
     
  12. Stickandmove

    Stickandmove Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah, I think he should be in. More importantly though - he should NEVER fight again. I was shocked to hear about his recent loss at light heavy to an UNKNOWN. I thought he'd tear through the division after fighting at heavyweight for all those years. He's obviously shot and has taken enough beatings - there is a good chance he's already seriously damaged. Please retire Chris.
     
  13. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,622
    Likes Received:
    2
    No and partly because his title reign was suspect to say the least.

    He should have lost the Oquendo and Golota fights, the McCline fight could have been a draw though most people won't admit it (McCline arguably won the first 5 rounds, including a KD), and let's not forget the Davarryl Williamson debacle. Go back and watch that fight and ask yourself "is this guy a HOFer?"

    Byrd was a tremendous fighter and had a very good career but let's not go around saying he belongs in Canastota.
     
  14. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,482
    Likes Received:
    2
    Seriously are you related to Byrd, Flatlander?

    Anyway, I don't know of any credible boxing analysis or historian who would place Chrissy in the HOF. Not one. You know as well as I do there have been many "skilled and slick" fighters over the years in the HW division who didn't come close to getting anywhere near the HOF. Chrissy is one more example out of many skilled and slick fighters who are unlikely to be nominated to the HOF.

    Off Topic: People often compare Byrd with the late Jimmy Young (God rest his soul). Although I was too young to remember Jimmy Young, I have several of his fights on DVD. Honestly speaking, both fighters are eerily similar in styles, i.e., feather-fisted, defensive-minded boxers. However I can say with my own observations that pre-1980 Jimmy Young was more of a complete boxer who fought a much stellar brand of opposition than Byrd. Also, Young's punch output and hand speed was as good if not greater than Byrd's. Young defeats Byrd in a 1970's Heavyweight vacancy title fight. :yep
     
  15. emanuel_augustus

    emanuel_augustus Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    14
    David Tua was a very impressive win. That said, Byrd doesn't belong in the hall. He was badly ko'd by Ibebuchi, dominated twice by Wlad and didn't have any huge wins really other than Tua. His wins over Holyfield, Vitali (sort of a luck job), and McCline were impressive, and his fight with Golota was a great scrap.

    Still, no way Chris belongs up there with the greats, but he did put together a great career, brought speed and skill to the division, and made millions of dollars for himself. Time for him to do something else, he'd make a great trainer or commentator.