Should GGG just move up now?

You can't eliminate Oscar and Tito just because it destroys your argument. The fact is he fought and beat both and gets full credit for doing so and the fact is his resume at 160 is better than GGG's.:deal GGG had a chance to legitimize his resume by fighting Ward but chose not to. He's to blame for the criticism he now faces no one else.

 

I tried to play nice but you're too dumb. I've already told your crazy ass several times before that a fight with Zoo and PBF was impossible to make and I have backed up my position with facts.:deal How many times do I have to tell you that PBF was a HBO fighter and Zoo a Showtime fighter. The only way this fight could have taken place was with a cross promotion PPV and neither fighter at that time was worthy of such a production a fight between them was impossible but you insist on bringing him up. PBF instead fought the guy who made Zoo quit in Hatton and stopped him. Lastly had PBF fought Zoo the same one who Hatton made quit he wouldn't have gotten any credit for it anyway by you and others. You would have simply said PBF beat an old Zoo and a prime Zoo murders PBF.:hi:

 

He would have gotten credit but as Floyd never fought him and was content to fight bums at 140 all we have is the typical ***** logic that Floyd would have won.

The fight never happened and Floyd never once attempted to make it happen, typical Floyd really. ATG without beating a prime ATG fighter or even HOF.

 

You really are a moron aren't you.

DLH got a gift at 160 against Sturm,what he achieved at 130,135,140,147 and 154 does not equate to greatness at 160.

All the while Hopkins legitimised his greatness at 160 by beating 2 naturally smaller men to cover over the fact that the middleweights at that time were average but Golovkin has to fight a naturally bigger guy to prove his legitimacy at 160?

You claim to be an impartial fan but you're not you're as bad as schlongmaster and the rest of idiots.

 

Dunno what you're on about, i'm firmly against the cross divisional madness boxing is becoming. I think anyone should be fighting in the division he's built for, with few exceptions

 

Him staying at 160 makes a lot of divas cry, so I say he should stay. I enjoy watching canelo and the rest of oversized 154 drainers kill themselves on the scales to avoid him

 

Zoo has a **** resume but you have the nerve to say all PBF did was fight bums:rofl Why wouldnt I pick or anyone else pick PBF to beat Zoo? Zoo got beat by a crack head in Phillips never avenged the loss and quit on his stool against Hatton.:rofl PBF proved he was great through 5 weight classes while losing only a handful of rounds in his prime in the process. Zoo stayed in a weak division feasting on trash when great fighters one division away were waiting never daring to be great like your God GGG. Did Zoo ever call out PBF?:huh PBF sure as hell called him out as well as Gatti, Mosley and Oscar as you can see PBF dared to be great and fought all 3.

13 seconds in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEHF5HX6Jb0:deal:



PBF's resume and accomplishments are 100000 light years beyond Zoo combined GGG. Neither of these fighters beat a prime ATG let alone a prime HOF fighter or elite fighter. PBF is an ATG the best fighter of this era and I'm not just the only one saying it ESPN and the Ring Magazine both agree.:hi:

 

Neither did Mayweather...

 

Yet you want GGG to fight Canelo a man who started at 147 and is naturally smaller? Do you not see the hypocrisy in that, you're so dumb so probably not.

I want GGG to dare to be great 34 with 35 fights and one of the weakest resumes in the sport today for a so called elite fighter. It's a cruel joke. Enough with the mandos and no hopers for easy paydays for fanboys like yourself. Take a risk make fights fans want to see no more Wades of the world. Step up or shut up.

 

You know what I'm actually now starting to hope he stays at 160 and retires without ever beating anyone of note. He's only hurting his legacy and people will bash the **** out of him when he retires. You can say what you want about Calzaghe but at least he took a risk and fought Kessler and Hopkins before calling it a day. Will GGG do the same?:deal

 

to be fair that would mean Canelo fighting 3G ONLY WHEN he was a damaged hand requiring surgery, and fighting a 40somethnig ATG.

its NOT that much of an ask - surely it would be better to fight a fully fit titlist AND a prime ATG-type.

 

PBF beat HOF fighters elite guys and ATGs. He didnt beat a prime ATG because there were no prime ATGs in the same weightclasses at the same time he was in them.:deal Hell GGG can't even beat a solid B to B+ fighter. Like I said before PBF's resume is 1000000 light years beyond GGG's. Triple B-Side fans should never bring up PBF's name again in any argument. PBF dared to be great he's the best of this era and proven he does nothing to help your argument.:deal PBF at 34 was champ at 5 weight classes a certified HOF and ATG whereas GGG at 34 full of question marks and what ifs and the best fighter he's beaten is Martin Murray. Just like DJ Khaled says " Don't play yourself".:hi:

 

You are a ****ing inbred idiot.

Canelo held the WBC title unification is the only reason I'd want them to fight.

You are still in denial about the calibre of Middleweights around in Hopkins reign.

You claim Johnson he wasn't a good 160 fighter.

Joppy is equally as bad as Geale.

Holmes was a poor champion, Cherifi, Allen, Eastman all top 5 middleweights and all b level opponents.

 

Tell me the murderers row Floyd went through at 140? In fact he stopped fighting serious contenders who wasn't at their peak after Castillo was robbed.

 

joppy is way better than danny G.