Should there be a super heavyweight division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Infern0, Dec 22, 2008.

  1. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    For the big lugs
     
  2. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,379
    Likes Received:
    561
    lolll
     
  3. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    what?
     
  4. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,494
    Likes Received:
    1
    There is maybe a case for saying there is sometimes too big a size difference between the fighters in a lot of heavyweight fights but I don't think there are enough quality fighters in the division at the moment to split in two.
     
  5. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    I mean Valuev ws Haye would be comedic genuius, little and large with large running and hiding
     
  6. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,386
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes name it the freak division :D
     
  7. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    8,957
    Likes Received:
    109
    No!

    Smaller guys should just move down to cruiserweight!!!!
     
  8. hambone

    hambone Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    I seem to recall for a split second there was a ABC belt that had a Super-Heavyweight division. I recall watching a fight and everything on ESPN or Fox or something.

    Thats the only time I remember seeing it but it was two huge linebacker type guys in the ring. The fight was horrible, so I didn't watch much and I can't remember the guys names. But the I must have saw that around 1999 or 2000.
     
  9. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,494
    Likes Received:
    1
    You sure it wasn't the olympics?

    There is a super-heavyweight in amatuers.
     
  10. djoc175

    djoc175 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    10,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thats just going to encourage Arreola and co. to double up their portions
     
  11. GalangK

    GalangK Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I seem to remember something similar too...

    I don't if it was an ABC title fight or just some random experiment they were doing for a superheavy division though.
     
  12. jockeylad

    jockeylad New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's worth thinking about. Nowadays boxers like the Klitschko's and Valuev, even Lennox are some of the biggest Heavyweights there has ever been and in future it seems they are due to get bigger. Why not, I don't think the average Heavy would have much of a chance against these giants. True all those mentioned are reknowned master boxers, but the main reason they are sucessful is because of their massive height, weight and reach advantage.

    Although I partly agree with it, I can't see it making the Heavy division any better, in fact it would probably spoil it because it would cease to be the flagship division, although it would be more competetive. The new Heavy champs would have lost respect and the newly appointed SuperHeavy champs would be in a less competitive division than what the Heavys was. Then you have the problem of where you put the weight limit. 250lbs? That would probabl restrict Heavyweight to anyone lighter/smaller than Wlad. Maybe a better Idea would be to expand Cruiserweight to up 219lbs, say, and have the revised Heavyweight division at 220lbs +. That way Heavy would still remain the flagship division, it wouldn't lose anything in terms of competition and it may only improve the relatively young Cruiser division. As people get bigger why keep adding bigger weight classes? Keep the same amount of divisions but expand them to suit the change in human growth.
     
  13. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,494
    Likes Received:
    1
    There is already a big leap from LHW to cruiser; think it's 25 pounds compared to only 7 between SMW and LHW and similar as you go down the weights. It's a big gap for anybody that gets too big for LHW. There was talk recently of a supercruiserweight at about 220 pounds. I don't think anyone wants any more weights but if you're gonna have 17 or whatever number there are, IMO it would make more sense to have a weight class round there and do away with some of the midget weights that only have 3-4 pounds between them.
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    25,227
    Likes Received:
    27
    Simply, no. The larger a person gets, typically they are slower and have worse coordination. Smaller Heavyweights can still bang with the big guys with the right gameplan.
     
  15. jockeylad

    jockeylad New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    IBA and WBU have SuperCruiser Divisions and, yeah there's Superheavy in the amateurs